Lloyd Smucker (R-PA)
Reporting Accountability and Abuse Prevention Act of 2026
A Republican bill with 19 Republican cosponsors · See all 19 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Reporting Accountability and Abuse Prevention Act of 2026 aims to amend title X of the Public Health Service Act. It would require grant recipients to comply with all applicable State and local laws regarding the notification or reporting of issues such as child abuse, sexual abuse, rape, and human trafficking. To receive or renew a grant, recipients must implement specific plans, including training and screening protocols. These plans must also include specific documentation regarding the age of minor patients and their sexual partners. Additionally, the bill allows federal officials to review records to ensure these requirements are being met. Failure to comply can result in seeking repayment of federal assistance and a suspension of future awards.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +7
Would children be better off under this?
The bill requires training, counseling to resist coercion, and screenings to detect abuse in minors.
- Scored +2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill includes mechanisms to seek repayment of federal assistance from non-compliant grant recipients.
- Scored +2
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill implements protocols to improve the safety and situation of patients through specific interventions and referrals.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
The bill requires grant recipients to maintain and make available sensitive records regarding the age of minor patients and their sexual partners.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Safety and Prevention: Grant recipients would be required to implement a plan that includes training on "appropriate interventions, strategies, and referrals to improve the safety and current situation of the patient" (Section 2(b)(1)(B)(ii)).
-
Protection of Minors: The bill requires protocols to ensure every minor presenting for treatment receives "counseling on how to resist attempts to coerce the minor into engaging in sexual activities" (Section 2(b)(1)(C)).
-
Early Detection of Abuse: Recipients must commit to conducting a "preliminary screening of any minor who presents with a sexually transmitted disease, pregnancy, or any suspicion of abuse" to rule out victimization (Section 2(b)(1)(D)).
-
Compliance with Local Laws: The bill ensures that grant recipients comply with all "applicable State and local laws requiring notification or reporting of child abuse, child molestation, sexual abuse, rape, incest, intimate partner violence, or human trafficking" (Section 2(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial Risk for Grant Recipients: If a grantee commits a subsequent violation of the requirements, the Secretary may "seek repayment of all monetary Federal assistance received by the grantee under this title on or after the date of enactment" (Section 2(d)(2)(A)).
-
Loss of Future Funding: For subsequent violations, the Secretary can choose "not award or provide any assistance under this title to the grantee for a period of at least 36 months" (Section 2(d)(2)(B)).
-
Increased Administrative Burden: Recipients must maintain specific records that "indicate the age of minor patients" and "indicate the age of the minor patient's sexual partners if such age is an element of a State notification law" (Section 2(b)(2)(A-C)).
-
Increased Oversight: Recipients must agree to allow the Secretary, the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Comptroller General of the United States to "review the records maintained by the grant recipient" (Section 2(c)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill requires training, counseling to resist coercion, and screenings to detect abuse in minors.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill includes mechanisms to seek repayment of federal assistance from non-compliant grant recipients.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill implements protocols to improve the safety and situation of patients through specific interventions and referrals.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill increases oversight by allowing federal officials to review the records of grant recipients. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The bill mandates compliance with all applicable State and local laws regarding the reporting of abuse. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The bill requires grant recipients to maintain and make available sensitive records regarding the age of minor patients and their sexual partners.
- 2/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/20/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
John JoyceRepublican · Pennsylvania
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
David SchweikertRepublican · Arizona
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Tim WalbergRepublican · Michigan
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas