Troy Nehls (R-TX)

Medal of Honor Act

H.R. 695 · House bill Armed Forces and National Security

A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 4 cosponsors

Last activity — Became Public Law No: 119-43.

Became law

Passed both chambers and was signed by the President, or became law without a signature.

Nothing more in Congress: it is law. When it takes effect depends on the dates written into it — some parts start at once, others a year or more later.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House 424–0
  3. Passed Senate unanimous consent
  4. To President
  5. Became Law

The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

This bill, titled the "Medal of Honor Act," aims to amend title 38 of the United States Code. The primary purpose is to increase the rate of the special pension paid to Medal of Honor recipients. It changes the current fixed monthly rate to a new rate linked to compensation paid to veterans without dependents. Additionally, the Act extends certain limits on pension payments.

Yes· 3 of 4

  • Scored +7

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    The bill specifically increases the financial compensation provided to Medal of Honor recipients.

  • Scored +7

    Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?

    The bill increases the monthly special pension rate for Medal of Honor recipients by linking it to veteran compensation rates.

  • Scored +5

    Would people over 65 be better off under this?

    The bill provides increased monthly pension payments which benefit elderly Medal of Honor recipients.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.

What Congress actually voted on

One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.

  • The House: a fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass The House sets aside its normal procedure to move quickly: no amendments, little debate, and a two-thirds bar instead of a simple majority. It is used for measures expected to be uncontroversial, so a bill that fails here failed despite broad expectations that it would not. Passed 424 yes · 0 no

    See who voted how →

    02/26/2025 · Roll call 51 · recorded as “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended”