Elijah Crane (R-AZ)

Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025

H.R. 6931 · House bill Native Americans

A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 2 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the Yavapai-Apache Nation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025, aims to resolve water rights claims for the Yavapai-Apache Nation in Arizona. It authorizes a water rights settlement and directs the construction of the Tu nl[[nichoh Water Infrastructure Project, including a pipeline from the C.C. Cragin Dam and Reservoir and a new drinking water system. The Act provides for mandatory appropriations to fund these infrastructure projects and a settlement trust fund. It also includes provisions for land to be taken into trust for the benefit of the Nation and addresses water availability for Yavapai County. Additionally, the legislation establishes rules for environmental compliance, land transfers, and legal limitations.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Scored +8

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    The bill settles long-standing water rights and provides significant funding for infrastructure, land acquisition, and autonomy over water assets for the Yavapai-Apache Nation.

  • Scored +5

    Does this invest in rural communities?

    The bill funds critical water infrastructure projects specifically for the Yavapai-Apache Nation to support rural water security.

  • Scored +3

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    Improved water infrastructure and addressing drinking water system accounts can help stabilize local resources for lower-income community members.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.