A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 19 cosponsors
Last activity — Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 0.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The "Packaging and Claims Knowledge Act" or "PACK Act" aims to amend the Federal Trade Commission Act regarding consumer product packaging. It establishes specific requirements for making claims that packaging is recyclable, compostable, or reusable. Under this bill, deceptive claims regarding these environmental benefits are prohibited. It requires specific qualifications for such claims and mandates that they be certified by an accredited third-party body. The Act also directs the Federal Trade Commission to issue guidance and establish an advisory council. Finally, it grants the FTC enforcement authority to treat violations as unfair or deceptive acts.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +8
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
Protects consumers from deceptive 'greenwashing' claims regarding recyclability and compostability.
- Scored +6
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
Reduces environmental deception by mandating scientific evidence for compostable and recyclable claims.
- Scored +5
Does this give the federal government more power?
Grants the FTC authority to regulate packaging claims and preempts state laws.
The opposite
- Scored -7
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
Explicitly preempts states and political subdivisions from enforcing non-identical packaging laws.
- Scored -3
Would business owners be better off under this?
Increases compliance burdens and requires third-party certifications.
- Scored -2
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
Small businesses may face increased compliance costs for third-party certifications and scientific evidence.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Prevention of Deceptive Claims: The bill prohibits people from claiming packaging is recyclable, compostable, or reusable if it is not actually such, which protects consumers from being misled (Section 2(a)(1)(A), 2(a)(2)(A), and 2(a)(3)(A)).
-
Increased Transparency for Consumers: For recyclable items, the bill requires companies to clearly explain the availability of recycling programs and collection sites, including the percentage of communities that have access (Section 2(a)(1)(B)).
-
Improved Information for Compostable Packaging: The bill requires a qualifying description for compostable claims if the packaging cannot be composted safely or in a timely manner in a home compost pile or device (Section 2(a)(2)(C)(i)).
-
Mandated Means for Reuse: For any unqualified claim of reusability, the person must provide a system for collection and reuse or offer a product that can be purchased to reuse the original packaging (Section 2(a)(3)(B)).
-
Standardized Packaging Identifiers: The bill regulates the use of resin identification codes to ensure packaging that is not eligible for certain claims does not use specific symbols (Section 2(a)(4)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Requirement for Third-Party Certification: A person cannot make claims regarding compostable, recyclable, or reusable packaging unless an accredited third-party certification body has certified that claim (Section 2(a)(5)).
-
Strict Definitions for Recyclability: Packaging can be deemed "not recyclable" if any component significantly limits the ability to recycle it or if the shape or size of the packaging prevents it from being accepted in recycling programs (Section 2(a)(1)(D)).
-
Limited State Authority: States and their political subdivisions are prohibited from establishing or enforcing any legal requirement that is not identical to the requirements set forth in this specific section (Section 2(c)(3)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Reduces environmental deception by mandating scientific evidence for compostable and recyclable claims. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Increases the accuracy of recycling and composting, potentially improving waste management efficiency.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Protects consumers from deceptive 'greenwashing' claims regarding recyclability and compostability. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Small businesses may face increased compliance costs for third-party certifications and scientific evidence.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would high-income households be better off under this? — Provides more accurate information for household waste and recycling decisions. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Reduces likelihood of spending money on products based on false environmental claims. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Provides more accurate information for household waste and recycling decisions. Would business owners be better off under this? — Increases compliance burdens and requires third-party certifications.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Grants the FTC authority to regulate packaging claims and preempts state laws. Does this make it easier to do business across state lines? — Creates a uniform federal standard for packaging claims, simplifying compliance for national companies. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Explicitly preempts states and political subdivisions from enforcing non-identical packaging laws.
- 10/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 0.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/1/2026
- Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- 7/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade.
- Introduced in House
Troy BaldersonRepublican · Ohio
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Randy FeenstraRepublican · Iowa
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Adam GrayDemocrat · California
David JoyceRepublican · Ohio
John JoyceRepublican · Pennsylvania
Laurel LeeRepublican · Florida
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin