Brad Finstad (R-MN)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish an exception for multiemployer plan participants to the requirements for automatic enrollment.
A Republican bill with 8 Democratic cosponsors · See all 18 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The goal is to establish an exception for multiemployer plan participants regarding the requirements for automatic enrollment. It modifies Section 414A(c)(3) to include multiemployer plans alongside church plans. These changes would take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +4
Would union members be better off under this?
The bill specifically accommodates the administrative structure of multiemployer plans frequently used by union members.
- Scored +3
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?
By exempting multiemployer plans from automatic enrollment requirements, the bill provides greater flexibility to union-managed benefit structures.
- Scored +2
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The bill affects the administration of multiemployer plans which are critical for retirement income for older workers.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Exception for multiemployer plans: The bill adds multiemployer plans to the existing exceptions for automatic enrollment requirements found in Section 414A(c)(3). This provides a specific exception for participants in these types of plans.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated: The provided text does not contain any details regarding potential negative consequences or burdens resulting from these amendments.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would union members be better off under this? — The bill specifically accommodates the administrative structure of multiemployer plans frequently used by union members. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Multiemployer plans are a primary source of retirement benefits for many middle-income workers. Would retired people be better off under this? — The provision relates to the management of multiemployer retirement benefits used by retirees. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill affects the administration of multiemployer plans which are critical for retirement income for older workers.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — By exempting multiemployer plans from automatic enrollment requirements, the bill provides greater flexibility to union-managed benefit structures.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this strengthen Social Security? — The bill provides administrative relief to multiemployer retirement plan structures which often support long-term financial security.
- 11/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/12/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Julie FedorchakRepublican · North Dakota
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Kelly MorrisonDemocrat · Minnesota
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin