A Republican bill with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 43 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Promoting Domestic Energy Production Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary goal is to change how adjusted financial statement income is computed. Specifically, it addresses how intangible drilling and development costs are handled. The changes would involve how depreciation and depletion expenses are accounted for. These amendments are intended to take these specific costs into account during the computation process. The new rules would apply to taxable years starting after December 31, 2025.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +2
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill provides tax-related relief specifically targeted at the energy production industry.
- Scored +1
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
Energy production often occurs in and provides economic benefits to rural communities.
- Scored +1
Is this likely to lower the price at the pump?
Increased domestic production can lead to a more stable or lower supply of fuel.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -3
Does this raise the taxes companies pay?
The bill adjusts how income is computed for tax purposes, which may reduce effective tax burdens for energy companies but alters standard corporate tax calculation methods.
- Scored -2
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?
This bill specifically aims to promote rather than reduce fossil fuel-related production.
- Scored -1
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
Increased domestic energy production may lead to continued or increased carbon emissions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Adjustments to Income Computation: The bill amends Section 56A(c)(13) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain deductions to be taken into account when computing adjusted financial statement income (Section 2).
-
Accounting for Depreciation and Depletion: Under the proposed changes, specific depreciation deductions allowed under section 167 and expenses under section 263(c) would be used to reduce the income amount (Section 2(a)(1)). Additionally, the bill directs the disregard of certain depreciation and depletion expenses taken into account on a taxpayer's applicable financial statement regarding intangible drilling and development costs (Section 2(a)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill provides tax-related relief specifically targeted at the energy production industry. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Energy production often occurs in and provides economic benefits to rural communities.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — Energy production activity can stimulate economic development in rural areas. Is this likely to lower the price at the pump? — Increased domestic production can lead to a more stable or lower supply of fuel. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — This bill specifically aims to promote rather than reduce fossil fuel-related production. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The focus on promoting production rather than regulation may have a negative impact on environmental protection standards. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Increased domestic energy production may lead to continued or increased carbon emissions.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill aims to promote domestic energy production, which can stimulate economic activity in the energy sector. Is this likely to create jobs? — By incentivizing domestic energy production, the bill may indirectly support job growth in the energy sector. Does this raise the taxes companies pay? — The bill adjusts how income is computed for tax purposes, which may reduce effective tax burdens for energy companies but alters standard corporate tax calculation methods.
- 4/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2025
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 1/23/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 33 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mark AmodeiRepublican · Nevada
Stephanie BiceRepublican · Oklahoma
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Troy BaldersonRepublican · Ohio
John CarterRepublican · Texas
Tom ColeRepublican · Oklahoma
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Jake EllzeyRepublican · Texas
Ron EstesRepublican · Kansas
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Pat FallonRepublican · Texas
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Kevin HernRepublican · Oklahoma
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Robert LattaRepublican · Ohio
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Cory MillsRepublican · Florida
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas
Ryan ZinkeRepublican · Montana