Julia Brownley (D-CA)
Supporting Military Families Exposed to Toxic Substances Act
A Democratic bill with 4 Democratic cosponsors · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Supporting Military Families Exposed to Toxic Substances Act," aims to amend title 38 of the United States Code. It directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide hospital care and medical services to specific family members and individuals. These individuals include those who resided at, worked at, or were in utero while their mother resided at or worked at certain locations. These locations are those where the Secretary has a presumption of service-connection for specific illnesses or conditions. To be eligible, the individual must demonstrate exposure to the same conditions that qualify veterans.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +8
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
The bill extends medical benefits to the family members of veterans who were exposed to similar toxic conditions.
- Scored +7
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill expands healthcare access to family members and individuals exposed to toxic substances at specific locations.
- Scored +6
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The bill supports the families of veterans by extending health care benefits based on shared environmental exposures.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill limits the provision of care to the amount provided in advance in appropriations Acts.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Expansion of Medical Coverage: The bill allows individuals who resided at, worked at, or were in utero while their mother resided at or worked at specific locations to receive hospital care and medical services for covered illnesses or conditions (Sec. 2(a)(2)(A)).
-
Addressing Environmental Exposure: It provides a pathway for care for people who can demonstrate they were exposed to the same conditions that qualify veterans for a presumption of service-connection (Sec. 2(a)(2)(B)).
-
Care for Vulnerable Groups: The provision includes individuals who were in utero while their mother lived or worked at qualifying locations (Sec. 2(a)(2)(A)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Budgetary Limitations: The Secretary is only able to provide hospital care and medical services to the extent and amount provided in advance in appropriations Acts (Sec. 2(b)(1)).
-
Exclusion Based on Medical Findings: Medical services may be denied if an illness or condition is found to have resulted from a cause other than the time spent at the specified locations (Sec. 2(b)(2)).
-
Requirement to Exhaust Other Options First: An individual or their provider must first unsuccessfully exhaust all available claims and remedies against a third party before the Secretary provides care or services (Sec. 2(b)(3)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The bill supports the families of veterans by extending health care benefits based on shared environmental exposures. Would children be better off under this? — The bill includes coverage for individuals who were in utero while their mother resided at or worked at qualifying locations. Would retired people be better off under this? — The bill provides medical coverage for individuals who may be dealing with long-term health issues from past exposures. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Expanding medical coverage helps mitigate the cost of treating illnesses caused by toxic exposure.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The bill extends medical benefits to the family members of veterans who were exposed to similar toxic conditions.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill expands healthcare access to family members and individuals exposed to toxic substances at specific locations.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Secretary to submit annual reports to Congress regarding the number of individuals served and denied care.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Providing medical coverage for conditions related to toxic exposure can reduce the financial burden of healthcare costs on families.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill limits the provision of care to the amount provided in advance in appropriations Acts.
- 1/5/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
- 12/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/3/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan