Henry Johnson (D-GA)
Bivens Act of 2025
A Democratic bill with 37 Democratic cosponsors · See all 37 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Bivens Act of 2025," aims to change how civil actions are handled. It proposes an amendment to Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes. The primary goal is to provide a civil remedy for individuals whose rights have been violated by a person acting under Federal authority. This would be achieved by inserting specific language into 42 U.S.C. 1983.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +6
Does this change how police departments operate?
The bill provides a civil remedy for rights violations by individuals acting under federal authority, enhancing accountability for federal officials.
- Scored +5
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The expansion of civil remedies against federal authority can provide greater legal recourse for racial equity and civil rights protections.
- Scored +5
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The bill offers a civil remedy for individuals whose rights are violated by federal actors, which aids the protection of individuals with disabilities.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Provision of a civil remedy: The bill seeks to provide a remedy for individuals whose rights are violated by a person acting under Federal authority. This is found in the opening text of the bill and the purpose stated in Section 2.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The expansion of civil remedies against federal authority can provide greater legal recourse for racial equity and civil rights protections. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill offers a civil remedy for individuals whose rights are violated by federal actors, which aids the protection of individuals with disabilities. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill provides legal recourse for civil rights violations which can benefit low-income individuals who may lack other forms of legal protection.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — The bill provides a civil remedy for rights violations by individuals acting under federal authority, enhancing accountability for federal officials. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The bill expands civil remedies for individuals whose rights are violated by those acting under federal authority, which includes protections for people with disabilities.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The bill strengthens due process by providing a mechanism for individuals to seek civil remedies when their rights are violated by federal authorities. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — By providing a remedy for federal authority violations, the bill offers a mechanism to protect individual privacy rights against federal overreach.
- 6/15/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 5/26/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/18/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 2/25/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/20/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 1/22/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 12/9/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/18/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Lizzie FletcherDemocrat · Texas
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Robert ScottDemocrat · Virginia
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida