Michael Lawler (R-NY)
Community Investment and Prosperity Act
A Republican bill with 6 Democratic cosponsors · See all 8 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is titled the "Community Investment and Prosperity Act." It aims to allow the Comptroller of the Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to increase certain investment limits. Specifically, it seeks to change the aggregate amount of investments that a national banking association and a State member bank may make to promote public welfare. The bill achieves this by amending the Revised Statutes of the United States and the Federal Reserve Act.
Yes· 3 of 14
- Scored +2
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Higher limits for public welfare investments can expand the reach of social support programs.
- Scored +2
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
Public welfare investments are often utilized for community programs that support minority populations.
- Scored +2
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?
Increased investment limits can support community development programs benefiting Hispanic communities.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Increased Public Welfare Investments: By increasing the investment limit from 15 to 20, national banking associations and State member banks may have more room to make investments intended to promote the public welfare. (Section 2)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Public welfare investments are often utilized for community programs that support minority populations. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Expanded public welfare investment capacity can be used for community-wide social improvements. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Increased investment limits can support community development programs benefiting Hispanic communities. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Higher limits for public welfare investments can expand the reach of social support programs. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — More funding via public welfare investments can assist in tribal and community development initiatives. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill allows for more funds to be directed toward community-based public welfare needs in rural areas. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban areas often benefit significantly from large-scale public welfare and community investments. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Increased community investments may indirectly benefit middle-class stability through improved local services. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Increased public welfare investments can contribute to general community stability.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill allows banks to invest more heavily in public welfare initiatives which can stimulate local economies. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Expanded public welfare investment limits can lead to more targeted funding for community and small business development. Is this likely to create jobs? — Increasing the limit for public welfare investments may facilitate more community-based economic development and job creation.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — Increased public welfare investment capacity can be directed toward improving rural community infrastructure and services.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Increasing the capacity for public welfare investments can provide more resources to combat poverty.
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 11/4/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Young KimRepublican · California
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia