Nick LaLota (R-NY)

Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act

H.R. 586 · House bill Armed Forces and National Security

A Republican bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 8 cosponsors

Last activity — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

In the other chamber's committee

Passed one chamber and has been handed to a committee in the other.

The committee decides whether it goes any further, and most bills that reach a committee never leave it. A committee that simply does nothing kills a bill without anyone ever voting against it, so no news from here is usually the news.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House 411–0
  3. In Senate committee

What this bill would do

This Act, known as the "Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act," directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct an epidemiological study. The study focuses on the prevalence of cholangiocarcinoma among veterans who served in the Vietnam theater of operations during the Vietnam era. The Secretary must consult with the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to carry out this study using specific cancer registries. Following the study, the Secretary is required to submit an initial report to Congress along with recommendations for action. Additionally, the Secretary must track the prevalence of this cancer in covered veterans and provide periodic updates. Finally, the bill extends a specific limitation on certain pension payments by one month.

Yes· 3 of 7

  • Scored +6

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    The bill directly addresses health concerns and financial limitations for Vietnam veterans.

  • Scored +5

    Would people over 65 be better off under this?

    The bill specifically benefits older Vietnam-era veterans through medical study and pension adjustments.

  • Scored +5

    Would retired people be better off under this?

    The bill impacts pension payments which are relevant to retirees/veterans.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.

What Congress actually voted on

One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.

  • The House: a fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to pass The House sets aside its normal procedure to move quickly: no amendments, little debate, and a two-thirds bar instead of a simple majority. It is used for measures expected to be uncontroversial, so a bill that fails here failed despite broad expectations that it would not. Passed 411 yes · 0 no

    See who voted how →

    04/07/2025 · Roll call 89 · recorded as “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended”