A Democratic bill with 45 Democratic cosponsors · See all 45 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The ``No Shame at School Act of 2025'' seeks to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act. It introduces mandatory certification requirements for certain students and establishes rules regarding unpaid school meal fees. The bill requires local educational agencies to revise meal claims to reflect eligibility for the period starting on the first day of the current school year. It also prohibits the physical segregation or overt identification of children who owe unpaid meal fees. Furthermore, it limits how schools can collect unpaid fees and interact with children regarding their debt.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +7
Would children be better off under this?
The bill protects children from social stigma, segregation, and the withholding of educational opportunities due to meal debt.
- Scored +7
Would students be better off under this?
Students are protected from the shame of unpaid fees and the withholding of grades or extracurricular participation.
- Scored +6
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill provides direct support for debt management and easier access to free or reduced-price meal programs.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Retroactive Reimbursement: Local educational agencies must revise previously submitted meal claims to reflect a child's eligibility for free or reduced price meals starting from the first day of the school year. (Section 2(b))
-
Protection from Identification and Segregation: Schools and food authorities are prohibited from physically segregating children, using special tokens or tickets, or using announcements or published lists to identify children based on their status regarding unpaid meal fees. (Section 2(c)(1)(A))
-
Direct Support for Families with Debt: For households owing a week or more of unpaid fees, agencies must attempt to directly certify the child for free meals or provide household applications with communications to encourage submission. (Section 2(c)(1)(B))
-
Prevention of Educational Penalties: The bill prohibits withholding educational opportunities, such as grades or participation in extracurricular activities, from children due to unpaid meal fee status. (Section 2(c)(1)(C)(ii))
-
Ban on Debt Collectors: Schools and food authorities are prohibited from using debt collectors to collect unpaid school meal fees. (Section 2(c)(1)(C)(iii))
-
Food Security during Meal Service: Schools may not take away or dispose of food that has already been served to a covered child based on their status. (Section 2(c)(1)(E))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Mandatory Certification Requirements: The bill changes the certification process from discretionary to mandatory for a local educational agency. (Section 2(a))
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill protects children from social stigma, segregation, and the withholding of educational opportunities due to meal debt. Would students be better off under this? — Students are protected from the shame of unpaid fees and the withholding of grades or extracurricular participation. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill provides direct support for debt management and easier access to free or reduced-price meal programs.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill provides retroactive reimbursement for meal eligibility and streamlines the certification process for families facing debt. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — By reducing the stigma of unpaid meal debt, the bill helps mitigate the social and educational disadvantages often faced by lower-income students.
- 11/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/12/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/8/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/30/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 40 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Stacey PlaskettDemocrat · Virgin Islands
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey