Clay Higgins (R-LA)
Uniform Standards Protection Act of 2025
A Republican bill with 5 Republican cosponsors · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is titled the "Uniform Standards Protection Act of 2025." It aims to limit how State laws apply to law enforcement uniform requirements. Specifically, it prohibits States from imposing requirements on what Federal law enforcement officers must wear. This includes officers responsible for enforcing immigration laws. Additionally, it stops any pending State legal proceedings regarding these uniform violations once the Act is enacted.
Yes
- Scored +6
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill expands federal authority by preempting state laws regarding law enforcement attire.
- Scored +3
Does this change how police departments operate?
The bill establishes uniform standards for federal officers by preventing state interference.
- Scored +2
Does this tighten control of the border?
The bill ensures that federal officers enforcing immigration laws are not hindered by state uniform requirements.
The opposite
- Scored -7
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The bill significantly reduces state authority by prohibiting them from regulating federal officer uniforms.
- Scored -2
Would immigrants be better off under this?
By shielding immigration enforcement officers from state-level oversight or legal proceedings, it may reduce local accountability.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Uniformity for Federal Officers: By preventing States from imposing uniform requirements, the bill ensures that Federal law enforcement officers are not subject to varying State rules regarding their attire (Section 2).
-
Termination of Legal Proceedings: This provision stops any current legal proceedings against Federal law enforcement officers for violating State uniform laws once the Act is passed (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Limitation of State Authority: The bill prevents States from exercising their laws regarding the uniform requirements of Federal law enforcement officers, including those enforcing immigration laws (Section 2).
-
End of Pending Legal Actions: Any current proceedings against a Federal law enforcement officer for violating a State law related to uniform requirements cannot continue after this Act is enacted (Section 2).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — The bill establishes uniform standards for federal officers by preventing state interference. Does this tighten control of the border? — The bill ensures that federal officers enforcing immigration laws are not hindered by state uniform requirements.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — By shielding immigration enforcement officers from state-level oversight or legal proceedings, it may reduce local accountability.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal authority by preempting state laws regarding law enforcement attire. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The bill significantly reduces state authority by prohibiting them from regulating federal officer uniforms.
- 2/23/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 10/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/26/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in House
Mark AlfordRepublican · Missouri
Scott DesJarlaisRepublican · Tennessee
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota