A Republican bill with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "No Funds for Foreign Abortions Act" aims to prohibit United States foreign assistance funds from going to foreign governments or organizations that subsidize or promote abortion. It seeks to codify the Mexico City Policy by restricting funds for entities that perform abortions, provide referrals, or engage in related biomedical research. The bill includes specific prohibitions on providing financial incentives for abortions or involuntary sterilization. It also establishes strict certification and monitoring requirements through the Secretary of State. Additionally, the act outlines penalties for violations, including the termination of assistance and required repayment of funds.
Yes
- Scored +5
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill reduces federal outlays by prohibiting funds from being sent to foreign entities that perform or promote abortions.
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires the Secretary of State to make compliance certifications publicly available on a government website.
The opposite· 3 of 6
- Scored -6
Does this send more money or help to other countries?
The bill reduces total foreign aid by prohibiting funds for various international organizations and governments involved in abortion services.
- Scored -5
Would women be better off under this?
The bill restricts the availability of funds for abortion-related services and reproductive healthcare education.
- Scored -5
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill restricts funding for organizations that provide abortion services or referrals, which may reduce access to reproductive healthcare.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Prevention of Abortion Subsidies: The bill prohibits funds from being used by foreign governments to provide abortions or assist in the procurement of abortions, which may benefit those who oppose such practices (Section 2(a)).
-
Protection Against Coercion: By prohibiting financial incentives for abortions or involuntary sterilization, the bill aims to prevent the coercion of individuals (Section 2(a)(4) and 2(a)(5)).
-
Restriction of Abortion Promotion: The act prevents funds from being used by entities that actively promote abortion, such as through counseling or lobbying for expanded access (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Exceptions for Specific Medical Situations: The bill excludes certain procedures from the definition of abortion, such as those to address an ectopic pregnancy or to save the life of a pregnant woman, ensuring these medical necessities are not prohibited (Section 2(d)(1)).
-
Exceptions for Victims of Crime: The bill allows for exceptions in cases of rape or incest, provided specific documentation is submitted (Section 2(f)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Impact on Multilateral Organizations: The bill prohibits funding to international organizations like the World Health Organization or the United Nations Population Fund if they perform abortions or provide referrals, which could impact their operations (Section 2(d)(5)).
-
Burden of Proof for Exceptions: For women seeking abortions due to rape or incest, the bill requires providing a copy of a restraining order, police report, or other documentation to qualify for an exception (Section 2(f)(1)).
-
Suspension of Funds During Investigations: If credible evidence of a violation is received, the Secretary of State must immediately suspend funds, which could halt ongoing assistance pending an investigation (Section 2(g)(2)(A)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill restricts the availability of funds for abortion-related services and reproductive healthcare education. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The reduction in foreign assistance funding may negatively affect low-income populations relying on international aid programs. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Changes to international aid distribution may affect urban-centered social services in developing nations.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this send more money or help to other countries? — The bill reduces total foreign aid by prohibiting funds for various international organizations and governments involved in abortion services.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill reduces federal outlays by prohibiting funds from being sent to foreign entities that perform or promote abortions.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill restricts funding for organizations that provide abortion services or referrals, which may reduce access to reproductive healthcare.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The bill's restriction on abortion-related funding may disproportionately affect women's reproductive autonomy.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Secretary of State to make compliance certifications publicly available on a government website.
- 9/11/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Marjorie GreeneRepublican · Georgia