Doug LaMalfa (R-CA)
Protect Innocent Victims of Taxation After Fire Extension Act
A Republican bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 8 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Protect Innocent Victims of Taxation After Fire Extension Act," proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It seeks to exclude qualified wildfire relief payments from an individual's gross income. These payments are compensation for losses, expenses, or damages resulting from a qualified wildfire disaster. A qualified wildfire disaster is defined as a federally declared disaster resulting from a forest or range fire occurring after December 31, 2014. The exclusion of these payments applies to amounts received after December 31, 2025. This provision is set to terminate for amounts received after December 31, 2032.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +5
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The bill provides financial protection for residents in areas prone to forest and range fires.
- Scored +5
Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster?
The bill provides direct financial relief to wildfire victims by ensuring their compensation is not taxed.
- Scored +5
Does this cut taxes for middle-income families?
The bill provides tax relief by excluding wildfire relief payments from gross income for individuals.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The exclusion of these payments from gross income results in a reduction of federal tax revenue.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Tax Relief for Fire Victims: The bill ensures that gross income does not include amounts received as a qualified wildfire relief payment, which means victims do not have to pay taxes on this money (Section 2(a)).
-
Broad Coverage of Losses: The relief covers various types of hardships, including additional living expenses, lost wages, personal injury, death, or emotional distress caused by a qualified wildfire disaster (Section 2(a)).
-
Protection Against Duplicate Losses: The relief applies to losses or damages that have not already been compensated for by insurance or other means (Section 2(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Deductions and Credits: Individuals cannot claim a deduction or credit for expenditures if they have already excluded that amount from their gross income via this act (Section 2(c)(1)).
-
Impact on Property Basis: The amount excluded from gross income cannot be used to increase the basis or adjusted basis of any property (Section 2(c)(2)).
-
Expiration of Benefits: The tax exclusion is not permanent and will not apply to amounts received after December 31, 2032 (Section 2(a)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill provides financial protection for residents in areas prone to forest and range fires. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill protects the full value of relief payments used for essential expenses like lost wages and living costs. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill ensures that wildfire-related compensation remains untaxed for middle-income victims.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster? — The bill provides direct financial relief to wildfire victims by ensuring their compensation is not taxed.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this cut taxes for middle-income families? — The bill provides tax relief by excluding wildfire relief payments from gross income for individuals. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The exclusion of these payments from gross income results in a reduction of federal tax revenue.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — By preventing taxation on compensation for lost wages and living expenses, the bill helps mitigate the financial impact of a disaster on low-income households.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/9/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
4 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Cliff BentzRepublican · Oregon
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Tom McClintockRepublican · California
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia