A Republican bill with 29 Democratic cosponsors · See all 57 cosponsors
Last activity — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 49 - 0.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Taskforce for Recognizing and Averting Payment Scams Act or the TRAPS Act. It requires the Secretary of the Treasury to establish a specific Task Force for Recognizing and Averting Payment Scams within 90 days. This Task Force must include representatives from various government agencies, financial institutions, consumer groups, technology platforms, and scam victims or support networks. The group is tasked with examining current payment scam trends, evaluating best practices, determining education strategies for consumers, and coordinating law enforcement efforts. Within one year, the Task Force must submit a public report detailing its findings, legislative recommendations, and anti-scam strategies to Congress, followed by annual updates. Finally, the Task Force will officially terminate three years after submitting that initial report.
Yes· 3 of 23
- Scored +8
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
Establishes a comprehensive task force to study, prevent, and educate consumers against payment scams.
- Scored +7
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Seniors are often primary targets for the types of payment scams this act seeks to prevent.
- Scored +7
Would retired people be better off under this?
Retirees are frequently targeted by sophisticated payment and digital scams.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 3(b)(1)(N) and Section 3(b)(1)(P): Including consumer groups, victims, and scam support networks on the Task Force ensures that the real-world experiences and needs of everyday people who have been targeted by criminals are directly represented in the group's work.
-
Section 3(e)(4): Developing a strategy for consumer education programs could be positive because it aims to better equip everyday people to identify, avoid, and report payment scam attempts to the appropriate authorities.
-
Section 3(e)(5): Coordinating efforts to ensure perpetrators of payment scams can be identified and pursued by law enforcement may help protect the public by holding criminals accountable for stealing money through electronic payment platforms.
-
Section 3(g)(1): Making the Task Force report publicly available online ensures transparency so that citizens can see what the government is discovering about payment scams and what legislative solutions are being proposed.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences, burdens, or harms for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would retired people be better off under this? — Retirees are frequently targeted by sophisticated payment and digital scams. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors are often primary targets for the types of payment scams this act seeks to prevent. Would business owners be better off under this? — Directly addresses business email compromise and other corporate payment scams. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Prevents financial losses that are more devastating to those with limited resources. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Provides better protections and education against digital fraud. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Protects a wide range of adult users from financial fraud. Would students be better off under this? — Students are high-volume users of electronic payment intermediaries. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults are frequent users of the digital payment platforms targeted by scams. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Reduces risk of large-scale fraudulent transfers. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Reduces the risk of financial fraud across all income levels. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Reduces risk of large-scale fraudulent transfers. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Reduces risk of large-scale fraudulent transfers.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Establishes a comprehensive task force to study, prevent, and educate consumers against payment scams. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Specifically addresses business email compromise scams which frequently target small businesses. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Reducing payment scams protects consumer assets and increases trust in digital payment systems.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Requires the task force to make its report and annual updates publicly available online. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Requires consultation with State, local, and Tribal agencies. Does this give the federal government more power? — Creates a new federal task force led by the Treasury Secretary.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — Addresses malicious advertisements, pop-ups, and digital payment network vulnerabilities. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — Task force is required to assess how international jurisdictions prevent payment scams.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — Combatting spoofing and malicious websites inherently involves improving digital security and privacy. Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — Includes representatives from tech platforms to identify and recommend ways to stop scams.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Preventing financial scams helps low-income individuals avoid devastating financial losses.
- 10/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 49 - 0.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/26/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/25/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/17/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/26/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/19/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/8/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Vern BuchananRepublican · Florida
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Jason CrowDemocrat · Colorado
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Virginia FoxxRepublican · North Carolina
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
James HimesDemocrat · Connecticut
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
William KeatingDemocrat · Massachusetts
Young KimRepublican · California
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Frank LucasRepublican · Oklahoma
Barry LoudermilkRepublican · Georgia
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
David ScottDemocrat · Georgia
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Derek TranDemocrat · California
David ValadaoRepublican · California
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Robert WittmanRepublican · Virginia
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia