A Republican bill with 22 Democratic cosponsors · See all 46 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Fairness for Khobar Act of 2025. It amends the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act. The purpose is to provide lump sum catch-up payments to specific victims. These are victims of the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing. The payments go to those who did not apply previously because of Department of Justice guidance.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +9
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
Highly beneficial for veterans affected by the Beirut and Khobar Towers bombings.
- Scored +8
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
Provides critical financial payments to victims of bombings that likely include service members.
- Scored +7
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Victims of the 1983 bombing are likely seniors and will benefit from these payments.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill increases government expenditure by authorizing additional catch-up payments.
- Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
The bill requires additional government spending for lump sum payments to victims.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Highly beneficial for veterans affected by the Beirut and Khobar Towers bombings. Would retired people be better off under this? — Retirees who were victims of these attacks will receive lump sum payments. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Victims of the 1983 bombing are likely seniors and will benefit from these payments. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Victims of 1983 and 1996 attacks are likely in middle-aged or senior demographics. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Many victims of these bombings suffer from long-term disabilities and will benefit from financial recovery. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Provides additional financial resources to affected victims. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Provides additional financial resources to affected victims.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Provides a remedy and flexible proof requirements for those denied payments due to administrative error. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Corrects erroneous government guidance that previously prevented victims from receiving payments.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — Provides critical financial payments to victims of bombings that likely include service members.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill increases government expenditure by authorizing additional catch-up payments. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — The bill requires additional government spending for lump sum payments to victims.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Provides financial recovery for specific victims of terrorism bombings.
- 10/1/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/28/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 9/16/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- 9/10/2026
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- 9/1/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/27/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 8/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/1/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in House
Mark AmodeiRepublican · Nevada
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
James ComerRepublican · Kentucky
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Julie FedorchakRepublican · North Dakota
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Lance GoodenRepublican · Texas
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Jimmy PatronisRepublican · Florida
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas