Dina Titus (D-NV)
Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation Act
A Democratic bill with 11 Republican cosponsors · See all 25 cosponsors
Last activity — Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Ms. Titus. Petition No: 119-16. (<a href="https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/2026021216">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation Act" or "FAIR Bet Act," proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary purpose is to change how wagering losses are handled. Specifically, it seeks to amend Section 165(d) of the code. The change involves striking the current "90 percent" figure and replacing it with "100 percent."
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +3
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
Provides more comprehensive deduction of losses which can assist middle-income earners with gambling activities.
- Scored +3
Would high-income households be better off under this?
Allows full deduction of losses, which benefits higher income earners with significant wagering activity.
- Scored +3
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
Provides higher deduction limits for those with significant wagering losses.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
By allowing more deductions, the bill could slightly reduce federal tax revenue.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Full Accounting of Losses: By changing the figure from "90 percent" to "100 percent" in Section 2, the bill allows for a different calculation regarding wagering losses under Section 165(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned: The provided text does not contain any information regarding potential negative consequences or burdens resulting from this amendment.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would high-income households be better off under this? — Allows full deduction of losses, which benefits higher income earners with significant wagering activity. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Provides higher deduction limits for those with significant wagering losses. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Provides more comprehensive deduction of losses which can assist middle-income earners with gambling activities. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Provides higher deduction limits for those with significant wagering losses.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this cut taxes for middle-income families? — The bill allows individuals to deduct 100% of wagering losses, which may reduce the tax burden for those with significant gambling losses. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — By allowing more deductions, the bill could slightly reduce federal tax revenue.
- 3/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/12/2026
- Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Ms. Titus. Petition No: 119-16. (<a href="https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/2026021216">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/10/2025
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 7/7/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Mark AmodeiRepublican · Nevada
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
Tom ColeRepublican · Oklahoma
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Mike EzellRepublican · Mississippi
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Adam GrayDemocrat · California
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Nick LaLotaRepublican · New York
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Guy ReschenthalerRepublican · Pennsylvania
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Haley StevensDemocrat · Michigan
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
David ValadaoRepublican · California
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey