Troy Downing (R-MT)
Protecting Private Job Creators Act
A Republican bill with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 7 cosponsors
Last activity — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 448.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Protecting Private Job Creators Act," aims to change how certain securities are handled. It seeks to except quotations of fixed-income securities from specific regulatory requirements. These requirements currently exist under Section 240.15c2-11 of title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The bill defines fixed-income securities to include notes, bonds, debentures, and certificates of deposit. It also covers these items if they are convertible into equity securities or carry rights to purchase equity.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +2
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill provides regulatory relief for those issuing or quoting fixed-income securities.
- Scored +2
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
By exempting fixed-income securities from certain regulations, the bill provides relief to private job creators and issuers.
- Scored +1
Would high-income households be better off under this?
The bill may benefit high-income investors by altering the regulatory landscape for fixed-income securities.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
Exempting quotations from regulatory requirements may reduce transparency in financial markets.
- Scored -2
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
Reducing transparency requirements for security quotations may decrease available information for investors.
- Scored -1
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill reduces the scope of federal regulatory requirements for specific securities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Regulatory Relief for Fixed-Income Securities: By stating that Section 240.15c2-11 of title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations shall not apply to quotations of fixed-income securities, the bill removes certain regulatory requirements for these specific financial instruments (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are identified within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill provides regulatory relief for those issuing or quoting fixed-income securities. Would billionaires be better off under this? Would high-income households be better off under this? — The bill may benefit high-income investors by altering the regulatory landscape for fixed-income securities. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Changes to securities regulations often impact those with higher concentrations of investable assets. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Exempting quotations from regulatory requirements may reduce transparency in financial markets. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill reduces the scope of federal regulatory requirements for specific securities.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — By exempting fixed-income securities from certain regulations, the bill provides relief to private job creators and issuers. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The removal of regulatory requirements for certain securities quotations could improve market liquidity and economic activity. Is this likely to create jobs? — Reducing regulatory burdens on fixed-income securities may facilitate easier capital raising for job creators. Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Reducing transparency requirements for security quotations may decrease available information for investors.
- 2/25/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-523.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 448.
- 1/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 11.
- 12/16/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/12/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Cleo FieldsDemocrat · Louisiana
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
David ScottDemocrat · Georgia
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri