Rules Committee · Jan 13, 2026
H.Amdt. 147: Its purpose is not yet published.
Adopted
With no one objecting, no names recorded
Mark Messmer (R-IN)
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 8 cosponsors
Last activity — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on H.R. 2270 is postponed.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
This bill, titled the ``Empowering Employer Child and Elder Care Solutions Act'', aims to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. It specifically seeks to exclude child and dependent care services and payments from the rate used to calculate overtime compensation. The amendment would add child or dependent care services and payments or reimbursements to specific sections of the Act. These changes would apply to workweeks starting on or after the date the Act is enacted.
Would business owners be better off under this?
It provides a cost-saving mechanism for businesses providing care-related benefits.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
It reduces the cost of providing employee benefits by preventing those benefits from inflating the overtime rate.
Does this make child care cost less?
It makes employer-provided childcare more cost-effective for the employer to offer.
Would union members be better off under this?
The bill directly reduces the value of overtime pay by excluding non-cash benefits from the calculation.
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?
By excluding care payments from overtime calculations, it reduces the total overtime pay workers receive for their labor.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Excluding care payments from overtime may reduce the total cash income of low-wage workers.
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
None of them settled the bill — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
01/13/2026 · Roll call 20 · recorded as “On Motion to Recommit”
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
Rules Committee · Jan 13, 2026
Adopted
With no one objecting, no names recorded
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Republican · Florida
Democrat · California
Republican · Iowa
Republican · North Carolina
Republican · Michigan
Republican · Missouri
Republican · New York
Republican · Pennsylvania