Barry Loudermilk (R-GA)
Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 20 cosponsors
Last activity — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 478.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
The Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act aims to update various financial reporting thresholds. It directs the Secretary of the Treasury to increase several dollar amounts used for currency transaction reports and nonfinancial trade or business reports. The bill also instructs federal agencies to update thresholds for suspicious activity reports. Additionally, it mandates updates for Money Services Business definition thresholds. These updates are intended to occur within 180 days of the Act's enactment. Furthermore, the bill establishes a system for periodic updates based on the Consumer Price Index.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +4
Would business owners be better off under this?
Reduces the regulatory burden and compliance costs associated with reporting various large transactions.
- Scored +3
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
Higher reporting thresholds reduce the regulatory and administrative burden on businesses and money services businesses.
- Scored +2
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
Higher reporting thresholds may reduce the frequency of administrative filings for high-value transactions.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?
Increasing reporting thresholds may slightly reduce the granularity of oversight for certain financial activities.
- Scored -1
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
Increasing thresholds may result in fewer reported large-scale transactions being publicly or internally tracked.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Thresholds for Currency Transaction Reports: The bill directs the Secretary of the Treasury to update $10,000 threshold amounts to $30,000, which may change how transactions are reported (Section 2(a)(1)(A)).
-
Updated Thresholds for Nonfinancial Trade or Business: The bill amends the threshold for reports relating to coins and currency received in nonfinancial trade or business from $10,000 to $30,000 (Section 2(a)(2)).
-
Adjusted Suspicious Activity Report Thresholds: Federal agencies will update $5,000 thresholds to $10,000 and $2,000 thresholds to $3,000 (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Updated Money Services Business Thresholds: The Secretary of the Treasury will update $1,000 threshold amounts to $3,000 (Section 2(c)(1)).
-
Inflation Adjustments: The bill requires updates every 5 years to various thresholds to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (Section 2(a)(1)(B), Section 2(a)(2), Section 2(b)(2), and Section 2(c)(2)).
-
Efficiency Review: The Secretary of the Treasury is tasked with reviewing reporting requirements to ensure they are effective and efficient in identifying illicit finance activity (Section 2(d)(1)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are explicitly detailed in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Reduces the regulatory burden and compliance costs associated with reporting various large transactions. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Reduces transaction reporting requirements for significant amounts. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Higher reporting thresholds may reduce the frequency of administrative filings for high-value transactions. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Higher thresholds may provide greater privacy and less frequent reporting requirements. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Higher thresholds benefit those conducting large, legitimate financial transactions. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The inflation-adjusted threshold updates provide more predictable financial reporting standards for the middle class.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Higher reporting thresholds reduce the regulatory and administrative burden on businesses and money services businesses.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country? — Increasing reporting thresholds may slightly reduce the granularity of oversight for certain financial activities.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — Higher thresholds may reduce the frequency of mandatory financial reporting for individuals. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Increasing thresholds may result in fewer reported large-scale transactions being publicly or internally tracked.
- 3/19/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-556.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 478.
- 3/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/22/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 30 - 24.
- 1/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/18/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 3/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Nicholas BegichRepublican · Alaska
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Mike EzellRepublican · Mississippi
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Richard HudsonRepublican · North Carolina
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Thomas MassieRepublican · Kentucky
Celeste MaloyRepublican · Utah
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Mike RogersRepublican · Alabama
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida