A Republican bill with 18 Democratic cosponsors · See all 29 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Rare Earth Magnet Security Act of 2025," proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create a new tax credit. The credit is intended for the domestic production of high-performance rare earth magnets. Taxpayers can receive $20 per kilogram for magnets produced in the United States, or $30 per kilogram if at least 90 percent of the component materials are also produced domestically. The bill includes specific definitions for what constitutes a rare earth magnet and how they are manufactured. It also establishes a phase-out schedule for the credit starting after 2034. Additionally, certain restrictions are placed on sourcing materials from non-allied foreign nations.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +6
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill provides significant tax credits for business owners involved in domestic magnet production.
- Scored +5
Does this cut taxes for small businesses?
The bill provides a production tax credit for manufacturers of high-performance rare earth magnets.
- Scored +4
Is this likely to create jobs?
The tax credit incentivizes domestic manufacturing of rare earth magnets, which may lead to industrial job growth.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Incentives for Domestic Manufacturing: The bill provides a tax credit of $20 per kilogram for magnets produced in the U.S., or $30 per kilogram if 90 percent of the component materials are also produced domestically (Section 2(a)(1) and Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Support for Technological and National Security Facilities: The Secretary may allow exceptions to coercivity requirements for "eligible manufacturers" who receive grants or contracts from the Department of Energy or Department of Defense and commit to building domestic facilities that show national security or supply chain merit (Section 2(d)(3)).
-
Financial Flexibility for Taxpayers: Taxpayers can elect to receive the credit as a payment, which can be treated as being made on the later of the tax return due date or the date the return is filed (Section 2(e)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Phasing Out of Financial Support: The credit amount decreases over time, specifically hitting 70 percent in 2035, 35 percent in 2036 and 2037, and reaching 0 percent after December 31, 2037 (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Restrictions on Sourcing Materials: Taxpayers may be ineligible for the credit if any component rare earth material used in manufacturing is produced in a non-allied foreign nation, though some materials have a delayed restriction (Section 2(d)(1)).
-
Regulatory Oversight and Requirements: The Secretary may require specific information or registration from taxpayers to prevent fraud, duplication, or improper amounts when certain elections are made (Section 2(a)(2)(B)(ii)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this cut taxes for small businesses? — The bill provides a production tax credit for manufacturers of high-performance rare earth magnets. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The production credit offers financial support to businesses manufacturing rare earth magnets in the United States. Is this likely to create jobs? — The tax credit incentivizes domestic manufacturing of rare earth magnets, which may lead to industrial job growth. Is this likely to grow the economy? — By incentivizing domestic production of critical materials, the bill aims to strengthen domestic industrial capacity.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill provides significant tax credits for business owners involved in domestic magnet production. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Domestic manufacturing facilities may be located in various urban or industrial areas.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The bill favors sourcing from allied nations over non-allied foreign nations to secure supply chains. Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The bill supports national security through domestic manufacturing of critical defense-related components.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The bill supports the development and manufacturing of high-performance technical materials.
- 4/21/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 2/21/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Brad FinstadRepublican · Minnesota
Julie FedorchakRepublican · North Dakota
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Richard HudsonRepublican · North Carolina
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Cory MillsRepublican · Florida
Kelly MorrisonDemocrat · Minnesota
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Eric SwalwellDemocrat · California
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
David ValadaoRepublican · California
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas