Virginia Foxx (R-NC)
Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act
A Republican bill with 15 Republican cosponsors · See all 15 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the ``Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act'', aims to limit federal funding for certain entities. It restricts federal funds from being used for purposes outside of the United States for specific foreign and domestic organizations. Specifically, it targets organizations that perform or promote abortions, provide items to procure them, or provide financial support to such entities. The restrictions apply to foreign nonprofits, nongovernmental, multilateral, or quasi-autonomous organizations, as well as certain domestic organizations. Exceptions are made for abortions resulting from rape or incest, or when the life of the mother is endangered.
Yes
- Scored +2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill restricts the allocation of federal funds to specific types of organizations, which reduces the scope of government spending in those areas.
The opposite· 3 of 6
- Scored -7
Does this make abortion easier to get?
The bill restricts federal funding for organizations that perform or promote abortion services, which may reduce the availability of such services or related support.
- Scored -5
Would women be better off under this?
The bill restricts funding for organizations that perform or promote abortion services, which can impact reproductive healthcare options.
- Scored -4
Does this send more money or help to other countries?
The bill restricts federal funds from being available to foreign nonprofit and multilateral organizations involved in abortion-related activities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Restriction on Abortion-Related Activities: Federal funds may not be used for organizations that perform or promote abortions, provide items to procure them, or provide financial support to those entities (Section 2(a)). This could be seen as a positive for those who want to ensure federal money is not used for these specific activities outside of the United States or by certain domestic organizations.
-
Protections for Specific Circumstances: The bill includes exceptions where the prohibitions do not apply to abortions resulting from rape or incest, or when the life of the mother would be endangered (Section 2(b)(2)). This ensures that in these specific life-threatening or traumatic situations, the restrictions do not take effect.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Foreign Organizations: Federal funds may not be available to foreign nonprofit, nongovernmental, multilateral, or quasi-autonomous organizations that perform or promote abortions, provide items to procure them, or provide financial support to those entities (Section 2(a)(1)). This could impact the ability of these groups to receive federal funds for their activities outside of the United States.
-
Restrictions on Domestic Organizations: Domestic nonprofit or nongovernmental organizations that perform abortions, develop items to procure them, or provide financial support to such entities are restricted from receiving or using federal funds for certain programs or activities (Section 2(a)(2)). This could impact domestic organizations that conduct these activities or fail to maintain physical and financial separation from those activities.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill restricts funding for organizations that perform or promote abortion services, which can impact reproductive healthcare options. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The restriction of funds to certain NGOs may reduce the social support services available to low-income households.
- Healthcare
- Does this make abortion easier to get? — The bill restricts federal funding for organizations that perform or promote abortion services, which may reduce the availability of such services or related support.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this send more money or help to other countries? — The bill restricts federal funds from being available to foreign nonprofit and multilateral organizations involved in abortion-related activities.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — By restricting funding for organizations that perform or promote abortions, the bill may impact reproductive health access often utilized by women. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The restriction of funds to certain non-governmental organizations could reduce the availability of social services provided by those entities.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill restricts the allocation of federal funds to specific types of organizations, which reduces the scope of government spending in those areas.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 2/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/21/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Rick AllenRepublican · Georgia
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Mark GreenRepublican · Tennessee
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Robert LattaRepublican · Ohio
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York