Robert Garcia (D-CA)
Epstein Wall Street Records Act of 2026
A Democratic bill with 22 Democratic cosponsors · See all 22 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill requires financial regulatory agencies to release and publish supervisory records related to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and their associates. It sets strict deadlines for these agencies to give physical copies of these records to specific congressional committees and to make them available to the public online. Agencies are required to protect victims' personal and medical privacy by redacting that information before public release. The bill also forces financial agencies to start immediate investigations into covered financial institutions and their senior executives. Finally, it mandates penalties and industry bans for executives who broke banking, securities, or anti-money laundering laws, and requires criminal referrals to the Attorney General when necessary.
Yes
- Scored +8
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires financial regulatory agencies to publish supervisory records related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell online in a searchable format.
- Scored +6
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill mandates investigations and penalties for financial institutions and senior executives that violated banking or anti-money laundering laws concerning illicit networks.
- Scored +4
Does this give the federal government more power?
The legislation directs federal financial regulatory agencies to conduct mandatory investigations and impose specific industry bans and civil penalties.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Subsection (b)(2) helps everyday people by requiring financial regulatory agencies to make supervisory records publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format, which promotes government transparency and holds powerful institutions accountable.
-
Subsection (b)(2) also protects individuals by explicitly requiring agencies to withhold or redact the personally identifiable information and personal or medical files of victims.
-
Subsection (c)(1) and Subsection (c)(2) benefit the public by forcing financial regulators to immediately investigate financial institutions and senior executives to determine if they broke banking, securities, or anti-money laundering laws regarding Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
-
Subsection (d)(1) and Subsection (d)(2) protect regular people by requiring regulators to impose industry bans and civil penalties on senior executives who violated laws or aided violations connected to Jeffrey Epstein's financial accounts.
-
Subsection (e) ensures accountability by requiring financial agencies to refer matters to the Attorney General if they reasonably find that a violation of Federal criminal law may have occurred.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific provisions that create negative outcomes, consequences, or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires financial regulatory agencies to publish supervisory records related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell online in a searchable format. Does this give the federal government more power? — The legislation directs federal financial regulatory agencies to conduct mandatory investigations and impose specific industry bans and civil penalties.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill mandates investigations and penalties for financial institutions and senior executives that violated banking or anti-money laundering laws concerning illicit networks.
- 10/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/15/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 20 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Christian MenefeeDemocrat · Texas
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Suhas SubramanyamDemocrat · Virginia
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia