A Democratic bill with 6 Democratic cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act," seeks to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. The primary goal is to reduce the standard workweek from 40 hours to 32 hours. It introduces new overtime pay requirements for workweeks exceeding 32 hours and specific daily overtime rates. The bill also outlines a multi-year phase-in period for these changes. Additionally, it prohibits employers from reducing compensation or benefits because of these new standards.
Yes· 3 of 15
- Scored +7
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Significant increase in potential income for hourly workers through expanded overtime.
- Scored +7
Would union members be better off under this?
Strengthens the financial position of unionized hourly workers through higher overtime pay.
- Scored +5
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Likely to increase earnings for entry-level hourly workers.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -7
Would business owners be better off under this?
Substantially increases labor costs and restricts the ability to adjust compensation.
- Scored -5
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
Increases labor costs for businesses due to lower overtime thresholds and prohibitions on reducing compensation.
- Scored -3
Would farmers be better off under this?
Agricultural labor often involves long hours that would become very expensive under these rules.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Overtime Pay for Workweeks: Employees will receive compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times their regular rate for any workweek longer than thirty-two hours (Section 2, Section 7(a)(1)(A)(I)).
-
Daily Overtime Pay for Longer Days: Employees will receive extra pay for longer workdays, specifically at one and one-half times the regular rate for work between eight and 12 hours, and at double the regular rate for work exceeding 12 hours (Section 2, Section 7(a)(1)(A)(B)).
-
Protection of Current Wages and Benefits: Employers are prohibited from reducing an employee's total workweek compensation rate or any other employee benefits due to the changes made by this Act (Section 2, Section 7(a)(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Phased Implementation of Overtime Thresholds: The full benefit of the 32-hour workweek threshold is not immediate; instead, it follows a multi-year schedule where the threshold for overtime pay decreases gradually over three years (Section 2, Section 7(a)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Significant increase in potential income for hourly workers through expanded overtime. Would union members be better off under this? — Strengthens the financial position of unionized hourly workers through higher overtime pay. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Increases overtime pay opportunities for the core workforce. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Provides higher pay for hours worked beyond 32 hours per week. Would students be better off under this? — Increases pay for students working hourly jobs. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Likely to increase earnings for entry-level hourly workers. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Positively impacts groups disproportionately represented in hourly labor. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Positively impacts groups disproportionately represented in hourly labor. Would men be better off under this? — Increases earnings for men in hourly sectors. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Hourly workers in rural areas would see increased overtime pay. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Higher concentration of hourly service jobs in urban areas would see increased wages. Would women be better off under this? — Increases earnings for women in hourly sectors and potentially supports work-life balance. Would business owners be better off under this? — Substantially increases labor costs and restricts the ability to adjust compensation. Would farmers be better off under this? — Agricultural labor often involves long hours that would become very expensive under these rules.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Increases wages for hourly workers through expanded overtime pay.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — Increases total earning potential for hourly workers through expanded overtime requirements. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Increases labor costs for businesses due to lower overtime thresholds and prohibitions on reducing compensation.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Amends the Fair Labor Standards Act to impose stricter national labor mandates on employers. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Sets a federal floor for work-hour standards that overrides less restrictive state norms.
- 9/8/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan