Keith Self (R-TX)
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the seventeenth article of amendment.
A Republican resolution with 9 Republican cosponsors · See all 9 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution proposes an amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The primary goal of the resolution is to repeal the seventeenth article of amendment. If ratified by three-fourths of the States within ten years, the repeal would become valid. The proposal includes a clause to ensure it does not affect Senators currently serving or chosen before the amendment becomes valid.
Yes
- Scored +8
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
Repealing the Seventeenth Amendment would return the power to elect Senators to state legislatures rather than direct popular vote, increasing state-level authority.
- Scored +3
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
State-based legislative selection of Senators may provide more structural weight to rural interests compared to direct popular vote.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
Moving away from direct elections for Senators reduces the transparency of the democratic process for the general public.
- Scored -3
Would people in cities be better off under this?
The shift from direct popular election to state legislative selection may diminish the political influence of high-density urban populations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- There are no specific positive impacts or benefits for individuals or groups of people explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Repealing the Seventeenth Amendment would return the power to elect Senators to state legislatures rather than direct popular vote, increasing state-level authority. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Moving away from direct elections for Senators reduces the transparency of the democratic process for the general public.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — State-based legislative selection of Senators may provide more structural weight to rural interests compared to direct popular vote. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The shift from direct popular election to state legislative selection may diminish the political influence of high-density urban populations.
- 6/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Eric BurlisonRepublican · Missouri
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Scott PerryRepublican · Pennsylvania
Victoria SpartzRepublican · Indiana