Janice Schakowsky (D-IL)
Recognizing a health and safety emergency disproportionately affecting the fundamental rights of children due to the Trump administration's directives that unleash fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change, while suppressing climate change science.
A Democratic resolution with 81 Democratic cosponsors · See all 81 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A concurrent resolution is how the House and the Senate settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes a health and safety emergency affecting children due to the Trump administration's directives. It states that these directives unleash fossil fuels, increase greenhouse gas emissions, and suppress climate science. The text points out that fossil fuel production increases air pollution and threatens the fundamental rights of children. It asserts that the national energy emergency declared by the administration is false because the country already produces ample energy. Finally, the measure demands that the administration reverse these executive orders, restore the mission of the Environmental Protection Agency, and bring back climate science data on federal websites.
Yes· 3 of 15
- Scored +9
Would children be better off under this?
The resolution is specifically focused on protecting children's health, safety, and fundamental rights.
- Scored +8
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
The resolution demands a reduction in atmospheric CO2 to stabilize the climate.
- Scored +8
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
It calls for the restoration of the EPA's core mission to abate pollution.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Children's Health and Rights: The resolution calls on the federal government to recognize a health and safety emergency for children, aiming to protect their fundamental rights to life, liberty, and property from climate-related harm. This is highlighted throughout the measure, particularly in the resolved section (1)(A), because it brings light to the physical and mental health burdens placed on youth.
-
Restoration of Environmental Protections and Science: The measure demands that the administration restore the Environmental Protection Agency to its core mission and put climate change resources and data back on federal websites. This is outlined in resolved section (1)(C)(ii) and (iii), which could benefit the public and students by providing open access to critical scientific research and environmental safety.
-
Promotion of Clean Energy: The resolution expresses opposition to executive orders that block renewable energy and demands a shift toward clean energy and reduced carbon dioxide levels. This is noted in resolved section (1)(B) and (3)(B), which could foster a safer climate system and cleaner air for everyone in the United States.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions that impose negative consequences, burdens, or harms on individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The resolution is specifically focused on protecting children's health, safety, and fundamental rights. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The resolution notes that low-income children are disproportionately burdened by energy costs and pollution. Would students be better off under this? — The resolution protects access to critical science data for students and academic institutions. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution addresses systemic environmental racism affecting vulnerable communities. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution mentions the protection of Indigenous children facing climate burdens. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The resolution addresses long-term climate stability relevant to young adults.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — It calls for the restoration of the EPA's core mission to abate pollution. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — The resolution demands a reduction in atmospheric CO2 to stabilize the climate. Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — The text advocates for a transition toward clean, renewable energy and electric vehicles. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — The resolution opposes the expansion of fossil fuel extraction and production.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution demands the restoration of science data to public federal websites. Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — The text opposes the suppression of climate change-related speech and data.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life? — The resolution opposes government-imposed censorship of climate science and academic speech. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution highlights the disproportionate impact of climate change on Black, brown, and Indigenous children.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The resolution calls for the restoration of federal funding for climate science research.
- 10/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/3/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/20/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/9/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 6/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 8/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 45 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Grace MengDemocrat · New York
Joseph MorelleDemocrat · New York
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Analilia MejiaDemocrat · New Jersey
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
David ScottDemocrat · Georgia
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Juan VargasDemocrat · California
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia