Christopher Murphy (D-CT)
A resolution supporting the designation of the week of September 14 through September 18, 2026, as "Malnutrition Awareness Week".
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4674-4675)
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This Senate resolution supports designating the week of September 14 through September 18, 2026, as Malnutrition Awareness Week. It points out that malnutrition is a major public health problem linked to poverty, food insecurity, and health issues across all ages. The text highlights how vulnerable populations, including communities of color, infants, children, and older adults, are particularly at risk. It also notes that disease-associated malnutrition drives up healthcare costs and hospital readmissions. Finally, the measure recognizes the contributions of nutrition professionals and the importance of existing Federal nutrition programs, community partnerships, and continued research.
Yes· 3 of 13
- Scored +3
Would children be better off under this?
The bill emphasizes the importance of nutrition for brain function and development in early childhood.
- Scored +3
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The bill highlights the importance of nutrition programs and care for older adults.
- Scored +3
Would retired people be better off under this?
The bill emphasizes the role of home- and community-based nutrition services for older adults.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
The resolution recognizes the contributions of registered dietitian nutritionists, healthcare providers, school food service workers, caregivers, and other professionals working to prevent and address malnutrition, which highlights the value of their labor (Resolved (2)).
-
It recognizes the importance of existing Federal nutrition programs, such as those under the Older Americans Act of 1965 and Federal child nutrition programs, for providing healthy food and preventing food insecurity and malnutrition (Resolved (3)).
-
The measure recognizes the role of community-based organizations like food banks and faith-based groups, noting the need for partnerships with healthcare providers to prevent malnutrition in underserved areas (Resolved (4)).
-
It acknowledges the importance of access to evidence-based nutrition care for vulnerable populations, specifically mentioning medical nutrition therapy under the Medicare program (Resolved (5)).
-
The resolution recognizes the importance of continued Federal research into nutrition, dietary patterns, and the human gastrointestinal microbiome to help prevent chronic disease and malnutrition (Resolved (6)).
-
It recognizes the importance of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services facilitating the implementation of the mandatory Malnutrition Care Score for adults aged 18 and older (Resolved (7)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups explicitly found within the text of this resolution.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill emphasizes the importance of nutrition for brain function and development in early childhood. Would retired people be better off under this? — The bill emphasizes the role of home- and community-based nutrition services for older adults. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill highlights the importance of nutrition programs and care for older adults. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill notes that Black children are disproportionately likely to experience food insecurity. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The bill highlights that Asian Americans experience higher rates of food insecurity. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill addresses malnutrition as a result of poverty and food insecurity which impacts low-income households. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill notes that American Indian and Alaska Native households are at significantly greater risk for food insecurity. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill recognizes the need for nutrition care for those with chronic diseases.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution highlights the importance of access to evidence-based nutrition care for vulnerable populations. Does this put more money into Medicare, the health coverage for people over 65? — The bill recognizes the importance of medical nutrition therapy under the Medicare Program. Does this put more money into medical research? — The bill recognizes the importance of continued Federal research into nutrition and its link to chronic disease.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into public schools? — The bill recognizes the role of Federal child nutrition programs in supporting well-being.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill acknowledges the link between malnutrition and poverty as a public health problem to be addressed.
- 9/14/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4674-4675)
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.