Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)

A resolution condemning the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for its ongoing human rights abuses, including its use of politically motivated espionage claims to justify arbitrary detention and executions.

S.Res. 819 · Senate resolution International Affairs

A Republican resolution with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4390)

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution condemns the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for ongoing human rights abuses. It specifically highlights the use of politically motivated espionage claims to justify arbitrary detention and executions. The text cites patterns of torture, forced confessions, and the targeting of various groups like journalists, women, and religious minorities. It also notes the regime's role in directing terrorist organizations that have caused deaths of United States Armed Forces members. Additionally, it addresses threats to regional stability and freedom of navigation caused by Iranian-sourced systems. Finally, the resolution calls for the release of political prisoners and encourages holding Iranian officials accountable.

Yes

  • Scored +5

    Would women be better off under this?

    The resolution highlights the protection of women from systematic discrimination and violence in Iran.

  • Scored +5

    Would students be better off under this?

    The text specifically mentions students as a group targeted by the Iranian regime.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.