Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
A resolution celebrating the accomplishments of title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, also known as the Patsy Takemoto Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act, and recognizing the need to continue pursuing the goal of educational opportunities for all women and girls.
A Democratic resolution with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S3061)
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution celebrates the accomplishments of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. It recognizes the progress made in providing educational and athletic opportunities for women and girls. The resolution highlights ongoing challenges, such as sexual harassment and disparities in sports and high-wage fields. It also addresses concerns regarding the current administration's actions toward Title IX enforcement. Finally, it calls upon the executive branch to protect all students from discrimination based on sex.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +9
Would women be better off under this?
The resolution focuses on protecting educational, athletic, and professional opportunities for women and girls.
- Scored +9
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
The resolution explicitly calls for the protection of students based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics.
- Scored +9
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
The resolution celebrates and calls to protect the progress made in educational and athletic opportunities for women and girls.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this make it easier to use public money at a school other than the local one?
The resolution opposes the dismantling of programs that promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in educational institutions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Educational and Athletic Opportunities: The resolution celebrates how Title IX has led to improved graduation rates, increased access to professional schools, and greater access to competitive sports for women and girls. (Resolution, Section 1(A) and 1(B))
-
Expanded Protections for Vulnerable Students: The resolution calls for the protection of students against discrimination based on pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics. (Resolution, Section 4(A) and 4(B))
-
Enhanced Safety from Harassment: There is a call for the executive branch to ensure schools prevent and respond to sex-based harassment, including sexual assault and stalking. (Resolution, Section 4(D))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Fragmented Civil Rights Enforcement: The transfer of Title IX enforcement responsibilities from the Department of Education to the Department of Justice is described as a move that will fragment civil rights enforcement and create confusion for schools and higher education institutions. (Resolution, Whereas clause regarding the Department of Justice)
-
Risk to Vulnerable Student Groups: The text states that certain administrative actions are being used to marginalize, harm, or erase transgender, nonbinary, or intersex students. (Resolution, Whereas clause regarding the Office for Civil Rights)
-
Loss of Academic and Diversity Programs: The resolution alleges that current actions are being used to eliminate academic studies and school programs that address gender-based inequities and promote diversity, equity, and inclusion. (Resolution, Whereas clause regarding the Trump administration)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly calls for the protection of students based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution focuses on protecting educational, athletic, and professional opportunities for women and girls. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The resolution's emphasis on diversity and equity benefits all marginalized groups in education. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Increased access to professional schools and high-wage fields can aid upward mobility for low-income students. Would white Americans be better off under this? — The resolution promotes equality for all students regardless of sex or gender identity.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The resolution celebrates and calls to protect the progress made in educational and athletic opportunities for women and girls. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The resolution calls for protecting students from discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The text highlights the need to protect women and girls of color from being scrutinized and marginalized. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The resolution notes that Title IX helps women enter high-wage fields, which supports economic mobility.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution calls for the efficient processing of individual complaints of discrimination within the Department of Education. Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution advocates for maintaining Title IX enforcement within the Department of Education rather than transferring it to the Department of Justice.
- Education And Technology
- Does this make it easier to use public money at a school other than the local one? — The resolution opposes the dismantling of programs that promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in educational institutions.
- 6/23/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S3061)
- 3 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington