John Thune (R-SD)

A resolution to constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen.

S.Res. 664 · Senate resolution Congress

A Republican resolution with no cosponsors

Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1690; text: CR S1674)

Adopted

The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.

Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Officially Recorded
  3. Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

This resolution establishes the majority party's membership for specific committees during the One Hundred Ninteenth Congress. It identifies the members assigned to the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, and the Committee on Indian Affairs. These assignments remain in effect until successors are chosen. The resolution was submitted by Mr. Thune and subsequently agreed to by the Senate.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Scored +1

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    The determination of membership for the Committee on Indian Affairs ensures a legislative structure for representing Native American interests.

  • Scored +1

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    The formalization of the Armed Services Committee membership provides the structure necessary for veteran-related policymaking.

  • Scored +1

    Does this reduce what the federal government spends?

    By establishing committee leadership, the bill facilitates the legislative process for budgetary oversight through the Appropriations Committee.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.