Richard Durbin (D-IL)
A resolution celebrating the 175th anniversary of the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA).
A Democratic resolution with 5 Republican cosponsors · See all 7 cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1051; text: CR S1051)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
S. Res. 642 is a resolution celebrating the 175th anniversary of the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA). The resolution recognizes the organization's history, including its founding in 1851 and its role in providing services like childcare, education, and health programs. It acknowledges the YMCA's impact on millions of people across the United States. The Senate expresses appreciation for the YMCA's service and commends its staff and volunteers. Finally, it encourages ongoing support for efforts to reduce social isolation and loneliness.
Yes· 3 of 24
- Scored +3
Would children be better off under this?
Recognizes the YMCA's role in childcare, youth sports, and summer camps.
- Scored +3
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Identifies the YMCA as the largest provider of fitness programs for older adults.
- Scored +3
Would retired people be better off under this?
Explicitly mentions being the largest provider of fitness programs for older adults.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Provision of Essential Services: The YMCA serves as a leading nonprofit provider of early childcare, education, before and afterschool programs, and summer camps, which supports families and children.
-
Community Health and Wellness: The organization provides swim lessons, youth sports, fitness, and well-being programs, specifically serving as the largest provider of fitness programs for older adults.
-
Support for Vulnerable Populations: The YMCA has provided safe housing during the Industrial Revolution and emergency childcare, nutrition assistance, and remote learning spaces during the pandemic.
-
Educational Opportunities: The organization launched the first night school and English as a Second Language (ESL) classes, and established the Youth and Government Program for civics education.
-
Social Connection: The YMCA creates spaces for people of all ages and backgrounds to connect with neighbors and address social isolation and loneliness.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups listed in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — Recognizes the YMCA's role in childcare, youth sports, and summer camps. Would retired people be better off under this? — Explicitly mentions being the largest provider of fitness programs for older adults. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Identifies the YMCA as the largest provider of fitness programs for older adults. Would immigrants be better off under this? — Specifically highlights the launching of English as a Second Language (ESL) classes. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Highlights the YMCA's role in providing essential childcare and nutrition assistance. Would men be better off under this? — Positive impact through the recognition of community and fitness services. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Commends the YMCA's role in community connection and fitness programs. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — States that the YMCA serves people of all abilities. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Notes that the YMCA serves 10,000 communities in every state and territory. Would students be better off under this? — Recognizes the YMCA's roles in night school, civics education, and afterschool programs. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Mentions headquarters in Chicago and widespread community presence in cities. Would women be better off under this? — Positive impact through the recognition of childcare and family services. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Acknowledges the YMCA's Youth and Government Program and educational offerings. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Recognizes the YMCA's service to all people regardless of background. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Recognizes the YMCA's service to all people regardless of background. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Acknowledges the value of YMCA community services. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Recognizes the YMCA's role in providing ESL classes and community services. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Mentions creating spaces where all people feel welcome. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Supports the availability of community fitness and childcare services. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Recognizes the YMCA's service to all people regardless of background. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Recognizes the YMCA's service to all people regardless of background.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution recognizes the YMCA's role in providing fitness and well-being programs. Does this make mental health care easier to get? — The bill encourages efforts to address social isolation and loneliness through community spaces.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make child care cost less? — Recognizes the YMCA as a leading provider of early childcare and education.
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/12/2026
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1051; text: CR S1051)
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1051; text: CR S1051)
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Bill introduced.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana