Christopher Coons (D-DE)
A resolution honoring Dr. Jane Goodall and her legacy as an ethologist, conservationist, and activist.
A Democratic resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8183; text: CR S8135-8136)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
S. Res. 498 is a resolution to honor Dr. Jane Goodall for her work as an ethologist, conservationist, and activist. It recognizes her research on chimpanzees and her contributions to primatology. The resolution highlights her efforts in providing scholarships for women, protecting great apes, and inspiring youth through programs. The Senate agrees to commemorate her birth on April 3, 2025, and April 3, 2026. These dates are proclaimed as "Jane Goodall Day" across the country.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +6
Would women be better off under this?
Honors a female pioneer in science and supports scholarships for young women.
- Scored +5
Would students be better off under this?
Celebrates environmental education and educational scholarships.
- Scored +5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
Honors a legacy of conservation and the protection of the natural world.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for women in science: The Jane Goodall Institute has provided over 300 scholarships to young women to support their education.
-
Youth community engagement: The Roots & Shoots youth program has inspired over 1,470,000 young people in over 65 countries to participate in activities that make a difference in their communities.
-
Environmental education and conservation: The Jane Goodall Institute promotes environmental education and leads community led conservation.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for people are mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — Honors a female pioneer in science and supports scholarships for young women. Would students be better off under this? — Celebrates environmental education and educational scholarships. Would children be better off under this? — Roots & Shoots program inspires youth to engage in community improvement. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Promotes education and scholarships for young women in science.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Honors a legacy of conservation and the protection of the natural world. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — Commemorates work in wildlife field research and habitat protection.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — Recognizes Dr. Goodall's role in paving the way for women in science.
- 11/10/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8183; text: CR S8135-8136)
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont