Mike Crapo (R-ID)
A resolution expressing support for the designation of September 2025 as "National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month".
A Republican resolution with 2 Democratic cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6959; text: CR S6958-6959)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for designating September 2025 as National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month. It highlights statistics showing that millions of men live with prostate cancer, and hundreds of thousands are diagnosed annually. The text notes that early detection and screening greatly increase survival rates. It also points out federal funding provided to the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense for cancer research. Finally, the Senate calls on the public to promote awareness and observe the month with appropriate activities.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +4
Would men be better off under this?
The resolution specifically addresses the health and awareness of prostate cancer, which disproportionately affects men.
- Scored +3
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The resolution targets a disease that becomes more common after age 50 through increased awareness and research.
- Scored +3
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The resolution calls for considering ways to improve access to healthcare services for detecting and treating prostate cancer.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would men be better off under this? — The resolution specifically addresses the health and awareness of prostate cancer, which disproportionately affects men. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The resolution targets a disease that becomes more common after age 50 through increased awareness and research. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The text acknowledges existing VA Precision Oncology Centers of Excellence for veterans with prostate cancer.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution calls for considering ways to improve access to healthcare services for detecting and treating prostate cancer. Does this put more money into medical research? — The resolution encourages research to improve screening, discover causes, and develop a cure for prostate cancer.
- 10/6/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6959; text: CR S6958-6959)
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland