John Thune (R-SD)
A resolution to authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of Desmond Bellard v. Ronald Wyden, U.S. Senator.
A Republican resolution with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2542; text: CR S2569)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This resolution authorizes the Senate Legal Counsel to represent Senator Ronald Wyden. Senator Wyden has been named as a respondent in a case titled Desmond Bellard v. Ronald Wyden, U.S. Senator. This legal matter is currently pending in the Oregon Supreme Court. The authorization is based on the Senate's ability to direct counsel to defend Members in civil actions related to their official responsibilities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Legal Defense for Senator Wyden: The resolution authorizes the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Senator in the case of Desmond Bellard v. Ronald Wyden, U.S. Senator, which is pending in the Oregon Supreme Court. This provides the Senator with representation under the authority granted by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
No significant interests or groups are affected by this bill.
- 4/10/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2542; text: CR S2569)
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York