Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Emissions Budget and Allowance Allocations for Indiana Under the Revised Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Update".
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 51. Record Vote Number: 520. (consideration: CR S6631)
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
How Congress voted
- See who voted how →A vote on whether to start debating something · 09/16/2025
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. The rule in question involves "Emissions Budget and Allowance Allocations for Indiana Under the Revised Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Update." If this resolution passes, the EPA rule will have no force or effect.
Yes
- Scored +5
Would business owners be better off under this?
Reducing environmental regulatory burdens may benefit energy-producing or industrial business owners in Indiana.
- Scored +5
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The bill promotes state autonomy by challenging federal environmental oversight in Indiana.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
By disapproving the EPA rule on emissions budget and allowances, the bill likely reduces the stringency of emissions controls.
- Scored -5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
Disapproving the EPA emissions rule may weaken environmental protections regarding air pollution in Indiana.
- Scored -5
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill seeks to reduce federal regulatory power by nullifying an EPA rule.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The Senate: a vote on whether to start debating something This decides only whether the chamber takes the measure up at all. Nothing about the measure itself has been decided when it passes. Blocked 47 yes · 51 no
09/16/2025 · Roll call 520 · recorded as “On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 60”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The provided text does not contain details regarding the specific contents of the EPA rule or the predicted impacts of its implementation or disapproval. Therefore, I cannot identify specific benefits or positive outcomes for individuals or groups.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text does not contain details regarding the specific contents of the EPA rule or the predicted impacts of its implementation or disapproval. Therefore, I cannot identify specific burdens or negative consequences for individuals or groups.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Disapproving the EPA emissions rule may weaken environmental protections regarding air pollution in Indiana. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — By disapproving the EPA rule on emissions budget and allowances, the bill likely reduces the stringency of emissions controls.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Reducing environmental regulatory burdens may benefit energy-producing or industrial business owners in Indiana.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The bill promotes state autonomy by challenging federal environmental oversight in Indiana. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill seeks to reduce federal regulatory power by nullifying an EPA rule.
- 9/16/2025
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 51. Record Vote Number: 520. (consideration: CR S6631)
- 8/1/2025
- Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works discharged by petition pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 142.
- 6/27/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Introduced in Senate