Timothy Kaine (D-VA)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Executive Office for Immigration Review relating to "Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals".
A Democratic resolution with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 48. Record Vote Number: 173. (consideration: CR S2816)
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
How Congress voted
- See who voted how →A vote on whether to start debating something · 06/16/2026
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to provide congressional disapproval of a specific rule. The rule in question was submitted by the Executive Office for Immigration Review regarding "Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals." If passed, the resolution would ensure that the rule has no force or effect. The resolution was introduced by Mr. Kaine and Mr. Durbin. It has been placed on the calendar.
Yes
- Scored +3
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The resolution prevents the implementation of new appellate procedures within the immigration court system.
- Scored +3
Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens?
The resolution prevents new appellate procedures that could potentially make the immigration legal process more difficult.
- Scored +2
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?
Blocking changes to immigration appeal procedures can provide more stability for immigrants, a demographic disproportionately represented by Hispanic Americans.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this give the federal government more power?
By disapproving a rule from an executive office, the resolution limits the administrative power of the Executive Office for Immigration Review.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The Senate: a vote on whether to start debating something This decides only whether the chamber takes the measure up at all. Nothing about the measure itself has been decided when it passes. Blocked 46 yes · 48 no
06/16/2026 · Roll call 173 · recorded as “On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 190”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Prevention of the Rule: By disapproving the rule submitted by the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the resolution prevents the new "Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals" from taking effect.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are mentioned: The provided text does not list any negative consequences or burdens that would result from the disapproval of this rule.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — The resolution prevents the implementation of new appellate procedures within the immigration court system. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Blocking changes to immigration appeal procedures can provide more stability for immigrants, a demographic disproportionately represented by Hispanic Americans.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — The resolution prevents new appellate procedures that could potentially make the immigration legal process more difficult.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — By disapproving a rule from an executive office, the resolution limits the administrative power of the Executive Office for Immigration Review.
- 6/16/2026
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 48. Record Vote Number: 173. (consideration: CR S2816)
- 6/3/2026
- Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 425.
- 4/30/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois