Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Fair Credit Reporting Act; Preemption of State Laws".
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2268-2269)
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to provide congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The rule in question relates to the "Fair Credit Reporting Act; Preemption of State Laws." If passed, the resolution would ensure that the rule has no force or effect.
Yes
- Scored +5
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
By disapproving a federal rule that addresses the preemption of state laws, the resolution potentially preserves the ability of states to maintain their own regulatory standards.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The resolution disapproves a rule regarding the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which may reduce the ability of states to enforce consumer protections through preemption.
- Scored -3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The disapproval of a consumer protection rule could potentially limit the efficacy of state-level protections for low-income consumers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the Bureau's Rule: By providing congressional disapproval, this resolution would prevent the rule relating to "Fair Credit Reporting Act; Preemption of State Laws" from having any force or effect.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No details provided: The provided text does not contain specific details regarding the contents of the rule or the consequences of its disapproval, so no negative impacts can be identified from the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The resolution disapproves a rule regarding the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which may reduce the ability of states to enforce consumer protections through preemption.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — By disapproving a federal rule that addresses the preemption of state laws, the resolution potentially preserves the ability of states to maintain their own regulatory standards.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The disapproval of a consumer protection rule could potentially limit the efficacy of state-level protections for low-income consumers.
- 5/13/2026
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2268-2269)
- 4/27/2026
- Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 399.
- 3/26/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Introduced in Senate