Andy Kim (D-NJ)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Regulation F); Time-Barred Debt".
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2269)
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to provide congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The rule in question relates to the withdrawal of a previous rule regarding the "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Regulation F); Time-Barred Debt." If passed, the resolution would ensure that the Bureau's rule has no force or effect. This action is taken under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +1
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The resolution protects consumers from certain debt collection practices that could impact households with limited resources.
- Scored +1
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
Preventing the withdrawal of debt collection regulations provides more stability for households managing existing debts.
- Scored +1
Would people in cities be better off under this?
Debt collection protections often provide more stability for residents in high-density urban areas subject to more frequent collection activity.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
By disapproving the Bureau's rule to withdraw previous protections, the resolution effectively reinstates or maintains more stringent restrictions on debt collection practices regarding time-barred debt.
- Scored -1
Does this give the federal government more power?
The resolution uses congressional oversight to nullify a rule submitted by a federal agency, thereby limiting that agency's regulatory movement.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- The resolution aims to prevent the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection from having force or effect. This would essentially block the Bureau's rule regarding the withdrawal of the regulation concerning "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Regulation F); Time-Barred Debt."
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups listed within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The resolution protects consumers from certain debt collection practices that could impact households with limited resources. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Preventing the withdrawal of debt collection regulations provides more stability for households managing existing debts. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Debt collection protections often provide more stability for residents in high-density urban areas subject to more frequent collection activity.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — By disapproving the Bureau's rule to withdraw previous protections, the resolution effectively reinstates or maintains more stringent restrictions on debt collection practices regarding time-barred debt.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution uses congressional oversight to nullify a rule submitted by a federal agency, thereby limiting that agency's regulatory movement.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Restricting debt collection on time-barred debt can help prevent low-income individuals from being burdened by expired debts.
- 5/13/2026
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2269)
- 4/27/2026
- Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 382.
- 3/17/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- Introduced in Senate