Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce relating to "One Year Suspension of Expansion of End-User Controls for Affiliates of Certain Listed Entities".
A Democratic resolution with 10 Democratic cosponsors · See all 10 cosponsors
Last activity — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 403.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This is a joint resolution introduced in the 119th Congress. It aims to provide congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce. The rule in question is titled ``One Year Suspension of Expansion of End-User Controls for Affiliates of Certain Listed Entities''. If this resolution passes, the rule will have no force or effect.
Yes
- Scored +1
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?
The resolution prevents a suspension of end-user controls, thereby maintaining existing regulatory oversight of technology exports.
- Scored +1
Does this give the federal government more power?
The resolution upholds the Bureau of Industry and Security's authority to implement end-user controls by striking down the proposed suspension.
- Scored +1
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?
The resolution disapproves a suspension of end-user controls, which may help maintain stricter oversight of sensitive technology transfers.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this make trade with other countries easier?
By disapproving a suspension of controls, the resolution maintains stricter trade restrictions on certain entities and their affiliates.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The provided text does not contain information regarding the specific contents or effects of the Bureau of Industry and Security's rule itself. Therefore, I cannot identify specific benefits or positive outcomes that would result from the disapproval or the rule's implementation.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text does not contain information regarding the specific contents or effects of the Bureau of Industry and Security's rule itself. Therefore, I cannot identify specific burdens or negative consequences that would result from the disapproval or the rule's implementation.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — The resolution prevents a suspension of end-user controls, thereby maintaining existing regulatory oversight of technology exports.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution upholds the Bureau of Industry and Security's authority to implement end-user controls by striking down the proposed suspension.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — The resolution disapproves a suspension of end-user controls, which may help maintain stricter oversight of sensitive technology transfers. Does this make trade with other countries easier? — By disapproving a suspension of controls, the resolution maintains stricter trade restrictions on certain entities and their affiliates.
- 4/30/2026
- Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 403.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon