Mike Lee (R-UT)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".
A Republican resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to overturn a specific rule issued by the Bureau of Land Management. The rule involves the "Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan" issued on January 13, 2025. The resolution follows a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability Office dated January 15, 2026. This letter concluded that the rule falls under the Congressional Review Act. If passed, the resolution would ensure the rule has no force or effect.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 3 of 5
- Scored -5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The resolution overturns a resource management plan, which likely reduces federal environmental protections for the Grand Staircase-Escalante area.
- Scored -5
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
By overturning the BLM rule, the resolution effectively stops the implementation of the approved resource management plan for this public land.
- Scored -5
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The reduction of monument management plans can often negatively impact the ancestral and cultural lands of Native American tribes.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the BLM Rule: By providing for congressional disapproval, the resolution would ensure that the "Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan" has no force or effect.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Elimination of the BLM Rule: The resolution would result in the Bureau of Land Management's rule regarding the "Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan" having no force or effect.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The resolution overturns a resource management plan, which likely reduces federal environmental protections for the Grand Staircase-Escalante area. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — By overturning the BLM rule, the resolution effectively stops the implementation of the approved resource management plan for this public land. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — The nullification of the resource management plan may reduce protections for the monument, potentially impacting carbon sequestration or ecosystem stability.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The reduction of monument management plans can often negatively impact the ancestral and cultural lands of Native American tribes.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution reduces the authority of a federal agency (BLM) to implement its management plan.
- 3/4/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John CurtisRepublican · Utah