Mark Kelly (D-AZ)
A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.
A Democratic bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 471.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona. The property consists of approximately 232.9 acres of National Forest System land located in the Tonto National Forest. To receive the property, the County must submit a written request within 180 days of the Act's enactment. The transfer will be made via a quitclaim deed without consideration. The County is responsible for all costs related to the conveyance, including surveys and environmental analyses. Additionally, the land must be used specifically to serve and support veterans of the Armed Forces.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +5
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The bill requires the land to be used exclusively for purposes that serve and support veterans.
- Scored +5
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
The bill requires the conveyed land to be used specifically for serving and supporting veterans of the Armed Forces.
- Scored +3
Does this invest in rural communities?
The land transfer provides Gila County with property for local veteran support services.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Support for Veterans: The land must be used for the purposes of serving and supporting veterans of the Armed Forces (Section (g)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial Burden on the County: Gila County is required to pay all costs associated with the conveyance, which includes the cost of a survey, any required environmental analyses or resource surveys, and any analysis required to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act (Section (e)).
-
Risk of Losing Property: If the land is used in any way that is inconsistent with serving and supporting veterans, the property title and interest will revert to the United States at the Secretary's discretion (Section (h)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The bill requires the land to be used exclusively for purposes that serve and support veterans.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The bill requires the conveyed land to be used specifically for serving and supporting veterans of the Armed Forces.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — The land transfer provides Gila County with property for local veteran support services.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill mandates that the land be used for purposes serving and supporting veterans.
- 7/23/2026
- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Lee with an amendment. Without written report.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 471.
- 2/4/2026
- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.
- 2/25/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona