John Curtis (R-UT)

Recycled Materials Attribution Act of 2026

S. 5674 · Senate bill Commerce

A Republican bill with no cosponsors

Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The bill is known as the Recycled Materials Attribution Act of 2026. It stops people from making misleading recycled content claims when they advertise, market, sell, or offer products to consumers. The bill clarifies that mass balance accounting can be used to back up recycled content claims if it follows a third-party certification system. It gives the Federal Trade Commission the power to enforce these rules and update the Green Guides. Additionally, the bill prevents states from making or enforcing their own laws regarding these specific prohibitions and enforcement provisions.

Yes

  • Scored +6

    Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?

    The bill protects consumers from deceptive and misleading recycled content claims in advertising and marketing.

  • Scored +5

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill clarifies standards for mass balance accounting and requires the FTC to update the Green Guides to ensure marketing clarity.

  • Scored +4

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The bill establishes federal standards and third-party certification requirements for recycled content claims to prevent greenwashing.

The opposite

  • Scored -5

    Does this leave more decisions to the states?

    The bill explicitly preempts state and local laws regarding recycled content prohibitions and enforcement.