A Democratic bill with 6 Democratic cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill creates a fast-track process in the Senate for Congress to consider joint resolutions related to certain Supreme Court decisions. It applies to decisions that interpret a federal statute or reinterpret the Constitution in a way that diminishes an individual right or privilege. Under this process, qualifying joint resolutions bypass normal delays, face strict limits on debate and amendments, and come straight to a vote. The rules also apply to matching legislation received directly from the House of Representatives. Ultimately, the legislation gives our elected officials a streamlined way to respond when the Supreme Court makes a ruling that changes federal law or narrows constitutional rights.
Yes
- Scored +2
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill establishes streamlined legislative procedures in the Senate to expedite consideration of joint resolutions responding to Supreme Court decisions.
- Scored +2
Does this make elections run better?
The legislation creates a fast-track process allowing Congress to quickly address Supreme Court rulings that impact federal laws and constitutional rights.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2 and Section 3: These sections establish a fast-track process for Congress to act when the Supreme Court issues a decision that diminishes an individual right or privilege, or interprets a federal statute. This could be considered positive because it allows our elected representatives to respond quickly to court rulings that impact the people.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 3(b)(2): This provision limits floor consideration and debate on these joint resolutions to not more than ten hours and restricts the number of amendments allowed. This could be considered a burden or negative because it severely limits the time our elected officials can thoroughly debate and review major changes to federal laws and constitutional rights.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make elections run better? — The legislation creates a fast-track process allowing Congress to quickly address Supreme Court rulings that impact federal laws and constitutional rights. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill establishes streamlined legislative procedures in the Senate to expedite consideration of joint resolutions responding to Supreme Court decisions.
- 9/24/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts