Todd Young (R-IN)
Protecting Biological Data as Critical Infrastructure Act
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Protecting Biological Data as Critical Infrastructure Act. It amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002. The bill requires the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of the Department of Homeland Security to protect genetic and other sensitive biometric data. It directs the agency to oversee security management, provide training, and protect biological data and critical biotechnology infrastructure. The legislation also instructs the agency to treat genetic data systems involving genomic sequences and other sensitive biometric data as critical infrastructure. Additionally, it mandates consultation and collaboration with United States biotechnology sector stakeholders and other relevant stakeholders.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +7
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?
The bill directs CISA to protect genetic and sensitive biometric data systems and treat them as critical infrastructure.
- Scored +6
Does this give people more control over their personal data?
The legislation establishes security protocols and protections specifically for sensitive genetic sequences and biometric data.
- Scored +4
Would business owners be better off under this?
Biotechnology sector stakeholders benefit from enhanced federal coordination, secure communication lines, and technical assistance.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2 amends section 2202(c) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the agency to oversee the planning, management, and coordination of duties related to the security management of genetic data systems involving genomic sequences and other sensitive biometric data. This is positive because it ensures sufficient staff are available to carry out these security duties.
-
Section 2 adds section 2202(c)(15) to provide training for relevant Federal personnel regarding protecting genetic data systems that involve genomic sequences and other sensitive biometric data, including addressing unique security challenges and ethical considerations. This is a benefit as it helps federal workers properly handle and understand these sensitive security and ethical issues.
-
Section 2 adds section 2202(e)(1)(U) to collaborate with United States biotechnology sector stakeholders and biosecurity policy stakeholders by facilitating engagements and providing a secure line of communication to raise concerns, report incidents, and request technical assistance. This is positive because it gives industry stakeholders a direct and secure way to report problems and get help.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — The bill directs CISA to protect genetic and sensitive biometric data systems and treat them as critical infrastructure.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — The legislation establishes security protocols and protections specifically for sensitive genetic sequences and biometric data.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Biotechnology sector stakeholders benefit from enhanced federal coordination, secure communication lines, and technical assistance.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill provides biotechnology stakeholders with secure communication channels and technical assistance from CISA to help address security concerns.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands CISA's responsibilities to oversee the security management of genetic data systems and treat them as critical infrastructure.
- 9/24/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire