Markwayne Mullin (R-OK)
A bill to provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes regarding land in Illinois, and for other purposes.
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Became Public Law No: 119-114.
Became law
Passed both chambers and was signed by the President, or became law without a signature.
Nothing more in Congress: it is law. When it takes effect depends on the dates written into it — some parts start at once, others a year or more later.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed Senate unanimous consent
- Passed House voice vote
- To President
- Became Law
No one's position on it was recorded: the Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote), and the House by voice vote (members called out yes or no together).
What this bill would do
This bill provides for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes regarding land in Illinois. It gives the United States Court of Federal Claims the jurisdiction to hear, determine, and render judgment on a land claim of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma under the Treaty of Grouseland. This jurisdiction is granted without regard to the statute of limitations or any delay-based defense. The jurisdiction expires one year after the enactment of the Act unless the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma files a land claim within that time. Additionally, except for a claim filed under this specific jurisdiction, all other current and future claims of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, its members, descendants, or predecessors to land in Illinois are extinguished.
Yes
- Scored +6
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
Directly benefits the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma by providing a path to settle land disputes.
- Scored +4
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
Provides a legal pathway for a Native American tribe to seek redress for historical land disputes.
- Scored +3
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
Bypasses statutes of limitations to allow the tribe to seek judicial determination of their claims.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Access to Court for the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma: Under Section 1(a)(1), the United States Court of Federal Claims is given jurisdiction to hear and render judgment on a land claim of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma under the Treaty of Grouseland without regard to the statute of limitations or delay-based defenses, which gives the Tribe a fair chance to present their land claim.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Extinguishment of Land Claims: Under Section 1(b), except for a claim filed under subsection (a)(1), all other claims, including any and all future claims, of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma or its members, descendants, and predecessors in interest to land in the State of Illinois are extinguished, which permanently blocks them from bringing any other land claims in that state.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Directly benefits the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma by providing a path to settle land disputes.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Provides a legal pathway for a Native American tribe to seek redress for historical land disputes.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Bypasses statutes of limitations to allow the tribe to seek judicial determination of their claims.
- Public Law (9/26/2026)
The text as it became law
- Enrolled Bill
The final version, on its way to the President
- 9/25/2026
- Signed by President.
- Became Public Law No: 119-114.
- 9/22/2026
- Presented to President.
- 9/14/2026
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5574)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5574)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 550.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5574-5575)
- Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
- 12/16/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 12/15/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8747; text: CR S8747)
- 10/14/2025
- Committee on Indian Affairs. Reported by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 119-76.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 185.
- 3/5/2025
- Committee on Indian Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
- 2/12/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois