A Democratic bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Alpha-gal Allergen Inclusion Act. Its main job is to change the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Specifically, it adds alpha-gal to the official definition of a major food allergen. This change includes things like ingredients from non-catarrhine primate mammals and certain red algae. The bill states that certain mammal-derived ingredients without detectable levels of alpha-gal are not included. The new rule will take effect 18 months after the bill is enacted.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
By adding alpha-gal to the definition of a major food allergen, the bill enhances food safety protections for consumers with this specific allergy.
- Scored +3
Would children be better off under this?
Children with alpha-gal syndrome will benefit from mandatory allergen labeling and awareness.
- Scored +3
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Young adults with alpha-gal allergies will benefit from clearer food labeling protections.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Better Allergen Awareness: By adding alpha-gal to the definition of a major food allergen under Section 2, the bill helps protect everyday people by ensuring this specific allergen is recognized under food safety laws.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Compliance Burdens: Based on the provided text, there are no explicit negative impacts or burdens mentioned for individuals or groups, though the text gives food makers 18 months under Section 2 to adjust to the new rule.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — Children with alpha-gal syndrome will benefit from mandatory allergen labeling and awareness. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Middle-aged individuals with alpha-gal allergies will be better protected by standard major allergen labeling. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Individuals managing severe food allergies like alpha-gal syndrome receive stronger regulatory protections. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors suffering from alpha-gal syndrome will experience improved food safety disclosures. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults with alpha-gal allergies will benefit from clearer food labeling protections.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — By adding alpha-gal to the definition of a major food allergen, the bill enhances food safety protections for consumers with this specific allergy.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Recognizing alpha-gal as a major food allergen improves health safety and awareness for affected individuals.
- 9/24/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.