A Republican bill with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The BLADE Act aims to protect the national security and economic interests of the United States by preventing foreign adversaries from extracting key technical features of closed-source artificial intelligence models. The bill targets "model extraction attacks" where entities attempt to replicate or improve their own AI capabilities by circumventing the controls of U.S. owners. It directs the Secretary of Commerce to conduct assessments to identify persons of concern and fraudulent account network providers. To deter these actions, the Act requires adding identified entities to the Entity List and allows the President to block their transactions through sanctions. Additionally, the government will maintain a public "AI Model Extraction Attackers List."
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +7
Does this make patent and copyright rules fairer?
The act provides robust protections for the proprietary technical characteristics of closed-source AI models.
- Scored +7
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill specifically protects the intellectual property and economic interests of U.S. technology owners.
- Scored +6
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?
The act helps protect sensitive AI model architectures from being extracted by adversaries.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Economic Competitiveness: The bill seeks to protect the intellectual property rights and economic competitiveness of United States entities by preventing the unauthorized acquisition of model capabilities (Section 2).
-
National Security Safeguards: By targeting model extraction attacks, the bill aims to prevent foreign adversaries from using these attacks as a "short cut" to acquiring advanced artificial intelligence capabilities (Section 2).
-
Information Sharing for Owners: The Act establishes an information-sharing mechanism that allows owners of closed-source AI models to voluntarily and confidentially share information about attacks with the Department of Commerce (Section 4).
-
Defense Best Practices: The Secretary of Commerce is required to publish a report providing best practices to help owners detect, prevent, and respond to model extraction attacks (Section 4).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Sanctions on Property: The President is authorized to block and prohibit all transactions involving the property and interests of identified persons of concern if that property is in the United States or under the control of a United States person (Section 5).
-
Restrictions via Entity List: Entities identified as conducting or facilitating model extraction attacks will be added to the Entity List maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security (Section 5).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Education And Technology
- Does this make patent and copyright rules fairer? — The act provides robust protections for the proprietary technical characteristics of closed-source AI models. Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — The bill imposes new regulatory-style controls and sanctions on entities engaging in AI model extraction.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — The act helps protect sensitive AI model architectures from being extracted by adversaries. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The bill encourages a diplomatic strategy to leverage allies and partners in detecting extraction attacks.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands the authority of the Secretary of Commerce and the President to impose sanctions and entity list restrictions. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the publication of an AI Model Extraction Attackers List and several public reports.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill specifically protects the intellectual property and economic interests of U.S. technology owners.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — By protecting intellectual property of AI models, the bill helps secure the economic competitiveness of U.S. entities.
- 8/7/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/5/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Tim ScottRepublican · South Carolina