A Democratic bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill establishes the Cleaner Transportation at Recreational Areas to Improve our Landmarks and Sites (Cleaner TRAILS) Initiative. The initiative aims to facilitate the installation of zero-emission vehicle fueling infrastructure and the use of zero-emission vehicles on National Forest System land, National Park System land, and certain related land. The strategy includes increasing the number of zero-emission vehicles in agency fleets and shuttle operations. It also focuses on supporting the use of emerging mobility options and zero-emission recreational vehicles. Additionally, the bill seeks to enhance electric vehicle adoption at locations supporting travel and tourism, such as airports.
Yes· 3 of 16
- Scored +6
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
The bill promotes zero-emission vehicle infrastructure and usage to reduce emissions on public lands.
- Scored +4
Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?
The bill focuses on electric vehicle charging infrastructure which supports renewable energy integration.
- Scored +4
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The bill provides resources to modernize transportation management on federally managed public lands.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Access to Zero-Emission Charging: The bill facilitates the installation of zero-emission vehicle fueling infrastructure on covered land, which includes National Forest and National Park lands (Section 3(a)).
-
Support for Travelers and Tourists: The strategy includes providing information to the public regarding the availability of local transportation services and existing or planned fueling infrastructure (Section 3(b)(1)(M)).
-
Improved Transportation Options: The initiative supports the use of emerging mobility options, such as micromobility and ridesharing, and seeks to increase the number of zero-emission vehicles used in shuttle operations (Section 3(b)(1)(5)).
-
Job and Workforce Development: The strategy includes developing training programs and workforce development programs to help agency staff transition to zero-emission technologies (Section 3(b)(1)(R)).
-
Enhanced Tourism Support: The bill directs consideration toward increased adoption of electric vehicles at locations that support travel and tourism, including around airports (Section 6(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Potential for User Fees: The bill allows for the collection of user fees for publicly accessible and agency-accessible zero-emission vehicle fueling infrastructure (Section 3(b)(1)(O)).
-
Impact on Utility Infrastructure: The expansion of fueling infrastructure may require upgrading utilities, which involves considerations regarding the electric grid and communication infrastructure (Section 3(b)(1)(Q)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — The bill promotes zero-emission vehicle infrastructure and usage to reduce emissions on public lands. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The bill provides resources to modernize transportation management on federally managed public lands. Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — The bill focuses on electric vehicle charging infrastructure which supports renewable energy integration. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Transitioning to zero-emission vehicles helps preserve the air quality of National Parks and Forests. Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — The bill supports zero-emission shuttle operations and emerging mobility options. Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — The bill enhances transportation infrastructure specifically for zero-emission electric vehicle travel. Does this invest in rural communities? — Infrastructure improvements help connect remote National Forest and Park lands to broader networks.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill supports the tourism and outdoor recreation industries. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes provisions for tribal entities to enter into infrastructure agreements. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill facilitates infrastructure and mobility options for remote and recreational areas. Would union members be better off under this? — The bill includes workforce development and training programs for the transition to new technology.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill promotes workforce development and training programs for zero-emission technologies. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Infrastructure investments in zero-emission technologies can stimulate local economies near national lands. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill supports the travel, tourism, and outdoor recreation industries.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal agency coordination and infrastructure deployment on federal lands. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires public availability of strategy and maps for charging infrastructure.
- 8/3/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland