A Democratic bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The ASAP Act aims to amend title 49 of the United States Code to provide competitive grants to State and local governmental authorities. These funds are intended to assist in addressing accessibility needs within legacy rail fixed guideway public transportation systems. The bill focuses on upgrading stations and facilities to meet or exceed current Americans with Disabilities Act standards. This includes projects to repair, modify, or relocate infrastructure to better serve individuals with disabilities. Additionally, the act establishes a process for coordination with disability advocacy entities.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +10
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The bill is primarily designed to improve accessibility for people with disabilities in transit.
- Scored +10
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?
The act specifically funds upgrades to ensure legacy rail systems meet ADA accessibility standards.
- Scored +9
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?
The bill provides significant funding to upgrade legacy rail infrastructure accessibility.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Accessibility for Individuals with Disabilities: The Secretary may provide grants to help entities upgrade legacy rail systems so that stations and facilities meet or exceed new construction standards under the Americans with Disabilities Act (Section 2(b)). This specifically includes benefits for people who use wheelchairs (Section 2(b)).
-
Improved Infrastructure and Planning: Grants can be used for repairing, improving, modifying, retrofitting, or relocating infrastructure, such as load-bearing members of a station's structural frame (Section 2(c)(1)(A)). Funds can also be used to develop or modify plans for accessibility projects (Section 2(c)(1)(B)).
-
Enhanced Service Experience and Equity: Recipients must adopt plans that aim to maximize accessibility for those with physical, sensory, and intellectual or developmental disabilities (Section 2(e)(1)). The act also requires addressing service equity for all riders, considering gaps for low-income riders, older individuals, and riders from communities of color (Section 2(e)(3)).
-
Empowerment through Advocacy Coordination: The bill encourages coordination between transit recipients and disability advocacy entities, such as centers for independent living or protection and advocacy systems (Section 2(f)). This includes allowing these organizations to perform accessibility assessments (Section 2(f)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Local Financial Burden: While the federal grant can cover up to 80 percent of the net project cost, the recipient is responsible for the remaining amount through local matching (Section 2(g)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill is primarily designed to improve accessibility for people with disabilities in transit. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill addresses service gaps for riders from communities of color. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill explicitly mentions addressing service gaps for low-income riders. Would retired people be better off under this? — Improved accessibility aids older individuals who may be retirees. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill's focus on accessibility benefits older individuals as specified in the text. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Improved rail accessibility directly benefits urban transit users.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The act specifically funds upgrades to ensure legacy rail systems meet ADA accessibility standards. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill requires addressing service equity for riders of color.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — The bill provides significant funding to upgrade legacy rail infrastructure accessibility.
- 7/22/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania