Maggie Hassan (D-NH)
Federal Cybersecurity Workforce Expansion Act
A Democratic bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Federal Cybersecurity Workforce Expansion Act authorizes the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to create a cybersecurity apprenticeship pilot program. This program aims to employ participants in cyber workforce positions within the Department of Homeland Security. Additionally, the bill establishes a pilot program providing cybersecurity training at no cost to veterans, members of the Armed Forces transitioning to civilian life, and military spouses. These initiatives are intended to address the national and federal shortage of qualified cybersecurity personnel. The Act also extends the Federal Cybersecurity Workforce Assessment through 2028.
Yes· 3 of 16
- Scored +7
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The bill creates a specialized, no-cost cybersecurity training pilot program for veterans and their spouses.
- Scored +6
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
The bill provides free cybersecurity training specifically for veterans and military spouses.
- Scored +5
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
The apprenticeship and training programs provide career pathways for those entering the workforce.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Job Training and Employment Opportunities: The bill establishes an apprenticeship pilot program designed to lead to employment in cyber workforce positions within a Federal agency (Section 4(b)(2)(C)).
-
Support for Veterans and Military Spouses: A pilot program will provide cybersecurity training at no cost to eligible individuals, including veterans and military spouses (Section 5(b)).
-
Educational Advancement: The training program for veterans and military spouses can incorporate coursework that qualifies for postsecondary credit toward an associate or baccalaureate degree (Section 5(c)(1)).
-
Increased Diversity in Cybersecurity: The Secretary may prioritize entities that have successfully increased or plan to recruit women, underrepresented minorities, and individuals from other underrepresented communities (Section 4(f)(5) and Section 5(f)(2)(A)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Service Obligations: Participants in the apprenticeship pilot program must enter into an agreement to continue employment in a Federal cyber workforce position for a period of service equal to the length of their apprenticeship (Section 4(h)(1)).
-
Financial Repayment Requirements: If an apprentice fails to satisfy their service agreement for any reason other than involuntary separation, they are required to repay the costs of the education and training provided (Section s 4(h)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The bill creates a specialized, no-cost cybersecurity training pilot program for veterans and their spouses. Would women be better off under this? — The bill explicitly mentions prioritizing the recruitment of women in cybersecurity. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The apprenticeship and training programs provide career pathways for those entering the workforce. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes provisions to prioritize the recruitment of underrepresented minorities. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes provisions to prioritize the recruitment of underrepresented minorities. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The provision of free training and potential for federal employment benefits lower-income individuals. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill includes the mention of providing services for individuals with barriers to employment. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill includes specific provisions and coordination for veterans.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill establishes apprenticeship and training programs designed to lead to employment in cybersecurity positions. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Addressing the cybersecurity workforce shortage helps protect critical infrastructure and the broader economy.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The bill allows the Secretary to prioritize entities that recruit women into cybersecurity roles. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill allows the Secretary to prioritize entities that recruit underrepresented minorities.
- Education And Technology
- Does this make college cost less? — The bill includes training that can qualify for postsecondary credit toward degrees at no cost to eligible individuals. Does this get reliable internet to more people? — By strengthening cybersecurity personnel, the bill helps protect the digital infrastructure of the nation.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The bill provides free cybersecurity training specifically for veterans and military spouses.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires annual reports to Congress regarding the progress and results of the pilot programs.
- 7/22/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
John CornynRepublican · Texas